this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
155 points (88.6% liked)

Games

33612 readers
1910 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

GTA 6 Devs: look at our amazing story and open world!

YouTubers: I'ma drive an alligator up off this ramp, skip off the tallest building, and then land on a blimp!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Not fucking happening. I wouldn’t pay £100 for any game.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s surprising that games are getting cheaper compared to the cost of living. If you take into consideration the fact that games are becoming more expensive to produce, I really don’t understand it.

Gaming is way cheaper for me than it was during the ps2 or ps3 era.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If GTA6 is $100 for the basic copy I hope absolutely nobody buys it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

I imagine there will be a premium version that's $100 plus but I can't imagine that they'll risk trying to sell it at that price for the base version. People aren't exactly running around with disposable income right now, at least in the US.

[–] Mini_Moonpie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It will be funny if they make it free to play because they think maximizing player count will translate into more shark card money than box price + shark cards. Not that I think that is likely, just a funny possibility.

[–] NastyNative@mander.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rockstar I would say is one of the few that can demand that price. I would pay $100.00 bucks cause Im going to play it for the next decade. We could be on GTA15 but rockstar dont roll that way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

It'll push a shit ton of new pirates, thus creating more headaches for them if $100 games become the new normal. It's almost like they love shooting themselves in the feet with a shotgun and then blaming everyone else as to why they can't walk like they used to.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I have paid full price for a game in 10 years and GTA6 will be late to the PC party anyway. Looks like I won’t be playing it until 2035.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AAA games are already $90CAD here with deluxe/special editions going for $120-$160. I can't remember the last time I actually bought one of those games because most of them are trash designed to exploit the player as much as possible. There are a lot of other hobbies I'd rather drop that kind of money on that respect my time heaps more than modern games.

I think Tiny Glade is the only game I play regularly that is an actual new release. Everything else is 5+ years old because I got them on sale for good prices. Also means they're already patched up and usually perform better instead of having people pay $90+ to beta test broken garbage.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I spent 20$ on the last game i played, and put over 140 hours into it. Just saying.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

This is some weird reporting.

For one thing, I'm not American, baseline game prices here took a similar hike during the PS4 era, so I'd be curious to see if or when US game prices adjust and whether that comes with a local price bump. Although looking at recent releases maybe they already did.

For another, it is kind of insane how much lower the baseline price of what used to be called "retail packaged goods" games has gotten, adjusted for inlfation. As I write this, Civ 7 is the best selling full price game on Steam, going for 69,99USD. That's 48-ish USD in 2010 money, the Internet tells me. The previous release to even get close to the best sellers list at that price (and it sold pretty terribly, as far as I can tell, at least on Steam), was Indiana Jones, for the same price. Everything else is much, much, much cheaper, with the list being dominated by games anywhere between free to play and thirty bucks.

That's two conflicting pushes. Games are dirt cheap now. You can't even sell them at the sticker price that was normal in the 2010s anymore, and even if you did, that's 30% less inflation-adjusted money than before. The average game developer salary has gone from high 90K to 115K in 2025 in that period as, again, the Internet tells me.

So basically GTA or no, I don't see how you get anything BUT GTA sequels and Call of Dutys going forward. It's MTX-fests or nothing. It's pretty messed up, IMO. I like splashy, good-looking AAA games and would take them any day over, say, a Marvel Rivals. But spoiler alert, Marvel Rivals is going to make all the money and you'll be lucky if you ever see a Ratchet sequel again, let alone a third party big single player game.

So... pick your poison, I suppose.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I still have a huge backlog of games released in the last 30 years, so I can really easy wait for every game to go into sale. There is absolutely no need or urge for me to buy any game on release.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Arrrr, alexa play despacito

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›