this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
190 points (90.6% liked)

Technology

60560 readers
3397 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago

Mixed feelings about this as someone with a relatively (per my portfolio) huge investment in Intel. It would result, eventually, in the end of Intel. But so many dumb people with so much money keep throwing money at his crap companies so it might work out in the short term to get out with a profit.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I was about to get extremely upset, and then I remembered I haven't used intel since 2012.

This is still extremely bad for the industry, regardless of whether you personally use it.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I have a 13700K that's growing increasingly unstable due to their fuckup on voltage control. Never again. My next rebuild will be AMD.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 3 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

havent built a new PC since 2019 but when I did, I specifically picked AMD because of the Specter problem that existed at the time. havent looked back since.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

oh, I agree.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Who wants to get in bed with Elon so he drives the brand into the ground? How much has Fidelity written down their investment in Twitter, 80%?

[–] pozzy77@lemmy.world 38 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They have to old slogan of intel inside ready to be rebranded as incel inside

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 29 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I appreciate him doing this after intel lost their magic, otherwise, it would have been much harder emotionally.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

They lost it in CPUs, but I think they're actually nailing it in GPUs though (for once(at least for the budget/entry level))

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Eh unless they have the most efficient overall, they won’t make inroads into the server market. The entry level laptop and desktop markets are getting smaller and has less margins.

[–] Peffse@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

Any source you can cite?

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

They have what, 2 models? And in the GPU market, they aren't even a pimple on the fly on the ass of nVidia or AMD

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 34 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't he busy enough buying the United States right now?

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I thought that was bought and paid for already.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 hours ago

It's more of an ongoing project.

[–] GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He’s going to rename the i series to something ridiculous like i69, i420, i1337, and iX isn’t he?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 24 points 4 hours ago

The new Incel X series

[–] psud@aussie.zone 41 points 6 hours ago

That would be good news for AMD

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You don't need to buy an entire company to control or profit from it... He's really that dumb isn't he. He could do the whole Black Rock thing and control every company in the world, instead he has this idea of just owning everything.

I'm starting to suspect the price speculation of things he owns is by his own hand, nothing to do with the market whatsoever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 60 points 7 hours ago

Right, because Intel needs MORE problems.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The modern Vanderbilt

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 78 points 8 hours ago (10 children)

That's one way to finally kill x86.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 202 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 90 points 10 hours ago (5 children)

Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel's scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 132 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This was always the inevitable outcome of capitalism. Just some rich lying dipshit buying the world.

[–] alsu2launda@lemmy.world 40 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I think elons would be needed to be broken down by government like the Rockefellers.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Musk-busting?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 12 points 6 hours ago

Let's hope it's just another wccftech article pulled out of author's anus...

[–] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

Bad vibes, I say.

For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

Tldr - it's a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

load more comments
view more: next ›