this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
310 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

60560 readers
3558 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 5 hours ago

Oh shit maybe we'll see someone companies switch to an alternative instead of paying microshit more money

[–] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I doubt Microsoft Word has changed that much for me to theoretically subscribe just to see it's 365 counterpart. Still rocking the 2007 version.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Me too haha. One of the first things I install.

[–] RickyWars@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

For existing customers, the price hike won't be kicking in until plan renewal, and there are options to downgrade the plan. Those who want to avoid using AI can downgrade the plan to the "Classic" or "Basic" Microsoft 365 plans.

Thankfully we can roll back to the "Classic Family Plan" without the AI features. But annoying that they automatically switched plans and I had to switch back. If I didn't see this article I'd be up for a big price hike when it renewed.

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone experiencing this should be thinking "man, I gotta ditch Microsoft before they try to fuck me again"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck the MS suite is such garbage. My work was sold in for Teams with all the BS. Now I have to either map up the filepath creating what we used to have, or I can't see the file folder and make a call at the same time. Onenote with it's arbitrary syncing. And good luck finding it again since it stored at some random place if you loose access.

Word and excel is decent, but for a person who likes to tinker with versions it's a nightmare to invite people to edit it.

Cluncky interface, slow and bloated all around

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago

The degree to which MS Teams can get fucked by the horse it rode in on is proportional to the number of registry entries their bloatware has on first install.

[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"You remember that llm we spend billions of dollars on, that nobody asked for? Well we're done half baking it into all our apps and now we're almost doubling our prices to help pay for it all."

The logic of the utterly deranged...

[–] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago

They did the same with 3.5 jack removal from phones, charged more for less

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 42 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, smart people: I sure do love Libre Office.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 10 points 8 hours ago

If smart people love libreoffice, then I must be dumb. Working with it always seems weird and I never like it.

Fortunately, I can use LaTeX for work; it is far from without issues but while being arcane sometimes (especially when tables are involved), it never really upsets me and the result looks very good. I can say neither for libreoffice or MS office. But at least the former doesn't charge for the experience.

I hope typst gains more traction; it seems really intuitive compared to TeX and you don't necessarily need a macro package. And while it doesn't produce the quality of TeX-based systems yet, it is already good. Then again, Knuth's goal first and foremost goal was quality (and it shows); the system just had to be usable by him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

why not just do:

microsoft 365: 6.99

microsoft 365 + copilot: 9.99

blobcat, think

[–] Romkslrqusz@lemm.ee 10 points 6 hours ago

… second paragraph of the article:

In addition to the basic plans getting Copilot rolled in, there are now additional "Basic," "Personal Classic," and "Family Classic" tiers without Copilot and "other advanced features" added for users who do not use AI in their workflows

[–] wioum@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

You damn well know why they dont do that $$$

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Make it too expensive and people will switch to Google docs.

[–] Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Google workspace just pulled the same crap with Gemini

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Excel is the deal breaker on that. My last company was all Google products and auth, but I still had to buy Excel for the accounting and HR teams.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Um excel certainly has its places, but accounting? Don't they have actual dedicated software for accounting? HR? Like payroll? Again don't they have actual software for that?

And I was thinking personal use, whose costs were posted. $100 a year, fuck that.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's hard to believe, but I work at a Fortune 100 company that's still heavily reliant on Excel.

Sure, we have specific software as System of Record (Oracle suite, mainly). But for all the day to day estimating and calculating and reporting and other noodling, people routinely export to Excel and play with numbers from there.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

The point is you can use google docs or Libreoffice for day to day mundane things.

It's only the huge power features that you need Excel for, maybe in engineering. For accounting when you get to that power feature point I'm surprised there isn't dedicated software.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 2 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

Excel is a spreadsheet, and spreadsheets like Excel are first and foremost aimed at accounting sort of tasks. Whether they actually need Excel versus something like Google Docs or Libreoffice is another thing. The big thing with Excel is that it gets used (and abused) to do things that it's not really intended for doing such as those spreadsheets that are full of macros trying to be an application, or those spreadsheets that are trying to be a database, and so forth.

From an engineering perspective, I find Excel to be annoying because it's clearly first and foremost an accounting tool, and some of its behaviors like the way it rounds numbers and tries to turn everything into a date is downright obnoxious. I still use it from time to time for quick and dirty things like whipping up a couple of plots quickly (and this doesn't really need Excel... but at work all the computers have Excel), but otherwise for anything more complicated I'd probably switch to something else.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Like it's a fun number cruncher, but for serious accounting that's tied into point of sale, accounts receivable, accounts payable, etc you really should be running something dedicated. That's why there are all these software companies making bank when from the outside you can't quite figure out what they do.

Protip on excel, when you start a new sheet ctrl+a, ctrl+1, change to number.

[–] send_me_your_ink@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

See you think that - but excel finds a way. We have what are lovingly called the "spreadsheets of doom" which accounting uses to manage all forecasts, and the bits that involve money flows. Did you know you can hook excel into Salesforce and pull all the sales records? A person who thinks her monitor is her computer (she has a Dell laptop) somehow found a way...

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I remember my dad had a problem and asked if he had to take the monitor or the tower to the shop.

[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 52 points 10 hours ago

You can call the sales team and ask them to change your subscription to the classic version to opt-out of Copilot and get the old price back, if you still need the subscription over changing to other open source office suites.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Makes me glad I continue to use the free Google and MS Office options and keep my cloud storage with a service that is dedicated to just storage.

Cuts down on all of the forced price increases due to the AI mess the MBAs need to justify the expense of.

[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Phew, this was a good reminder since I was meaning to cancel my subscription anyway. It was going to auto renew in 2 days. 😬

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 15 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

The fact that people are subscribing to office software is the biggest problem here. What sort of technical breakthroughs require so many updates that a subscription is necessary?

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

As much as they are pushing to stop 1 time purchases of office, they do still offer it. I purchased a license for like $20 off a discount site for Office 2021, and i have no clue why people need a subscription plan for this. It would take some very specific needs for that to ever be needed and I'm sure a huge percentage would be just fine with the 1 time purchase that lasts 3-4 years of support.

As for businesses that part stinks... once you get integrated with all the services offered, it's going to take a lot to back out since it's not just office they are probably subscribed to but everything else that enterprise has to offer. They are absolutely banking on people to suck it up and accept the position they are in and give in. It's awful, but at the same time if your business went all in and didn't anticipate this then they didn't do their job if you ask me when vetting everything. This feels similar to the recent buyout of VMware and are now pushing insane new license costs. The problem is they went to high where despite the effort it will take to change products people have to. We can only hope Microsoft is on the edge of crossing that line.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

They need money to fix all the exploits in that spaghetti software.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sparky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 10 hours ago (6 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

the only problem with onlyoffice is that it's electron.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Are you positive?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 5 hours ago
[–] dnzm@feddit.nl 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

~~Ehh, I'm fairly sure it's not. It certainly wasn't in the past. When do you believe that changed?~~

Never mind, you were talking about OO, not LO, my bad.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Onlyoffice is apparently Russian, headquartered in Latvia.

[–] humble_pete_digger@lemm.ee 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Latvia is not Russia, unless something recently changed

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

JFC it can be russian owned and russian controlled and russian employed and pay russian taxes while "headquartered" in Latvia.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 2 points 5 hours ago

Damn, we really didn't see that coming now did we? Can't wait until Amazon pulls that trigger on AWS.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 86 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I spent about 20 minutes today trying to get Copilot on Word to tell me how to disable Copilot on Word. Worth every penny.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

First thing I do with the Google Assistent on Android Phones is to tell it to disable itself. Cool thing is that it does.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 30 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I really wonder what their long term plan is here.

Hardly anyone really wants copilot, it doesn't add a lot of value, yet makes the product less competitive.

I totally get rent seeking, Office is so ingrained that it's almost impossible to get away from it. But why force AI on everybody? Why not add it as a bonus?

Is this just a desperate attempt to soften the massive losses of the AI investment?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

The AI hardware isn't for us. It's for Google and Microsoft, so they can steal your computer's CPU time and hard drive space so they can build their own personal Skynets. (Same thing with CoPilot, which requires 50gigs of your hard drive space. You're also paying for the privilege of being spied on, which is nice for them, I guess.)

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

To please the shareholders. Then, when AI is no longer deemed valuable and its tremendous costs sink in, they will remove it and layoff the teams that worked on it, to please the shareholders.

[–] Blum0108@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago

But they'll keep the prices high

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 12 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It's not for you. It's for them. Copilot digests everything you type into the Office apps, and it provides them with millions of real writing examples that are free from copyright (read the new Office EULA).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vaderaj@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago

The clippy we all deserved

load more comments
view more: next ›