this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
86 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

60526 readers
6379 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

sometimes you bring on a ceo just to get some controversial thing done. they can eat the blame and then leave

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 4 points 29 minutes ago

So like a corporate sin eater?

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

I'm embarrassed it took me so long to realize this. Somebody explained that to me recently, within the context of a conversation about layoffs. That CEO had no prior CEO experience, was only there for less than a year, and was part of the board of directors. In hindsight it seems so obvious.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 12 minutes ago

Don't worry though, they'll fail towards.

[–] Tiuku@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago

Ohh you mean the "pay for every little thing" -feature? Dang I really liked that

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is the signature feature that women initiate or was that some other app?

[–] TheFriar@lemm.ee 16 points 6 hours ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 37 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

There's a big problem with the "women message first" gimmick, and it's that they just don't.

If they don't simply let the match expire, you either get a shitty Gif, or something along the lines of "hey."

Maybe one in ten will actually send a message that genuinely starts a conversation.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

it would work better if it was "women swipe first'. men can look at and swipe the women who swiped them already. this solves two problems:

  1. women are not seen by anyone they don't want to be
  2. men don't need to spend hours swiping hundreds of women

please give me 1 million dollars

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

This means men will see many fewer women on the platform in many cases.

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 hours ago

Well cultural habits are slow to change. I suspect it would take some 20 years to change the dynamics such than women are always expected to make the first move.

Bumble was well positioned to push for that change, unfortunately earning revenue has a priority, they are are a business after all. Still their gimmick got the ball rolling, we'll see who picks it up next.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 62 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I literally saw so many profiles being like “I don’t message first”, like do you even understand what the app you’ve signed up for is?

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well, men CAN message first, as of like 8 months ago.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

I did hear about that.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 19 points 9 hours ago

I always wondered if they realised we actually can't send the first message.