About a decade ago, North Carolina made it illegal to use 100 year forecasts in government documents.
How’s that working out
this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
115 points (99.1% liked)
News
23880 readers
2429 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Did you ask chatgpt to find that link for you?
I did use ChatGPT as a search engine to get a link so people wouldn’t have to look it up.
It there a problem with that?
I think he was curious why the utm_source was chatgpt
You are correct
Hey, look! Everything is great in Texas!
Right?
You know what, no one correct me. It's embarassing enough living here.
Statistics are socialist.
🎵🎸🐄🛻🎵
Ain't no day duh, for Texas
No info for ol San Antone
Dallas is offline and Austin's all AFK
If you were wondering.
No data for Texas. Only partial information was available for seven other states.
I can tell you our homeowners insurance went up by $120/month near Houston. Never flooded, never froze, never had wind damage, never had a claim. Our house is under 2000sqft and inland.
Houston has significant hurricane risk, whether or not you've actually had a problem.
Didn't Houston have historic massive flooding from Hurricane Beryl? And insurance companies are still fighting and having to pay out for Hurricane Harvey back in 2017.
Your house is only one data point, and not the largest part of the calculation. Your neighborhood, county, and city infrastructure have a lot more to do with your insurance than your specific home. And the Houston area has a terrible track record with flooding.
No doubt, and I know the cost is distributed across the entire pool. I just mention it as a reference point.
Our neighborhood is older homes on higher elevation vs a significant percentage of newer developments that are in the flood plain (since that is the remaining land around here) Realistically, the insurance companies and developers share some blame in this because if you don't build houses in the higher risk areas, you are less likely to have to pay out significant claims on something. But, money upfront is all these people are going for.
Sorry g, my home owners only went up by $20 this year. Glad I live somewhere without any real natural disasters
Well yeah, everything’s expensive as hell. If anyone believed were looking at anything other than the second Great Depression, they’ve got another thing coming.
Yep. My regular ass deodorant was $8 damn dollars today. This isn’t fancy stuff folks. Basic ass deodorant is $8 in the grocery store. Like … WTF!?
It's really starting to look like we didn't land a recovery. We just put a temporary plug in the hole and called the job done.
I'm conflicted. Do I leave them or join them here? (Continue or halt my insurance payments I mean)
If I leave them I'm safely broke forever, If I join them well go broke together right?
Just accept that if your house burns down you now live in a tent on the same property. Until the local government evict you from your land for living on it in an unauthorized structure.
Or how ever your government does it there anyway, they don't like it when people live cheaply and come up with bullshit excuses to justify it.
Livin cheap = less $$$ absorbed by taxes = angry alphabet bois
Also welcome to lemmy comrade!
South Carolina 🫡