this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2025
157 points (93.9% liked)

World News

39626 readers
1506 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wait, some guys thought there was going to be repeat business selling an undersea cable cutting device and they went to the trouble of patenting it?

How many people are in the business of maliciously cutting these cables indiscriminately, it feels like this device is more of a build it and sell on the shady/black market kind of deal.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 days ago

Seems like general military-industrial-complex stuff. In the initial phase of an open war, say against an island nation that totally has always been your territory, you could quite openly want to cut cables, and the patents kinda protect against another company being the one that profits from a new method of doing so. (I have no idea if the Chinese government actually respects patents by companies within it.)

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wait... China has patent office?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

China produces 4 times the patents the US does. We should have burned the patent industry to the ground not force other countries to use them. We created a monster.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago

This is propaganda made by the "sharks eating international cable club" to take the bame off them

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Strange thing to patent.

Also why china wants war with anyone is beyond me when almost their whole economy is based on producing stuff for everyone.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

How is this exclusive? This has been shared on The China Show weeks ago.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am certainly not one of those PRC defenders around these parts, but if you don’t think Western countries have similar technology you are absolutely kidding yourself.

Now, messaging is important. So the question I’d ask is, was this one just an opportunistic discovery or a veiled threat?

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 6 days ago

They probably do, but I'm not sure how interested in using it they are. I think they'd much rather tap such cables to learn secrets.

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Cutting an undersea cable that one or multiple countries spent millions or billions on seems like a really good way to piss off a lot of people really quickly.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Considering how dependent on the internet our economies are, intentionally cutting an undersea cable should be considered an act of war.

Sabotaging a countries energy or water supply are. I'm pretty sure cutting telecommunications cables would have been prior to the internet. How it's this any different?

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would assume most nations would treat this the same as them bombing a radio tower in the 40s. Absolutely an act of war.

If nukes didn't exist you can bet your butts that most of these countries would not be playing around like this. The only reason they could even think doing that might be a good idea is because they know that nobody wants to kick off nuclear war. Still just seems like an unnecessary bear to poke if you ask me.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Amazing how nukes have turned from "Can't attack me. I have Nukes" to "Can't stop me attacking. I have nukes".

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago
[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

It's like 30 years ago when my parents used the landline in the middle of a download - an act of war.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sure, but when you're in the economic position that China is you can get away with that... although, they do you usually like to operate with plausible deniability, and this seems to cause problems for that.

Still though, China's typical response when they get called on their bullshit is "fuck you, do something about it".

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you’re rich they let you do it …

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is part of it, but it's more than that. A lot of countries are dependent on China as a supplier, and a buyer. It's... problematic to publicly criticize your primary source of steel.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 6 days ago

Still though, China’s typical response when they get called on their bullshit is “fuck you, do something about it”.

Not defending China in any way, but that's the response used by most powerful countries.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do they even get out of cutting these cables? How does this benefit china in any way?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Cutting a cable costs you just a few tens of thousand dollars while fixing a cable costs millions. If you can just claim it's 'just an accident', you can basically do it without consequence.

It also forces internet and possibly military communications to reroute, possibly over channels that can be intercepted.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It might also let you install a tap elsewhere on the cable without causing an obvious interruption. If it's already cut, your tapping won't be noticed. And if you see slightly worse signal quality when it's repaired... well that's probably just due to the quality of the repair work, I'm sure.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Your assuming that once it's cut it can be spliced back together. I'm not sure how true that is after water ingress.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago

Interesting