this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7497 readers
595 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They have a soft paywall now: https://archive.ph/zDCqm

These elites’ wealth derives not from their salary—this is what separates them from even extremely prosperous members of the professional-managerial class, such as doctors and lawyers—but from their ownership of assets.

The Atlantic has gone tankie.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Patrick Wyman in general has pretty good analysis I find. He's a historian, and he has a great podcast series on the fall of Rome which I can highly recommend.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't call that take tankie.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It’s a joke. Ask a dozen liberals what a tankie is and you’ll get a dozen conflicting answers. It’s just the new pejorative thought-terminating cliché, like “commie” or “pinko”.

[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Atlantic has gone tankie.

What does this mean?

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I mean they’ve identified the core difference between the proletariat/working class and the bourgeoisie/capitalist class. Namely that the bourgeoisie accumulate their wealth through their ownership of the means of production.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

It's similar to Marxist analysis, and Marxists are always slandered as "tankies."