this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
72 points (82.1% liked)

World News

32650 readers
758 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

I was interested in this video until I saw the domain takie.tube and looked up what a tankies is:

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof.

Now I don't think it makes sense to watch it

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 17 points 3 weeks ago

furthering the explanation: tankie as a term came about from people who agreed with the USSRs use of tanks to quash revolt in hungary

[–] wellfill@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

While Im not a tankie, they do have some historical appeal. You know like beating the Nazis, some small things here and there.

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

& solving homelessness

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net -3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah and after they did they turned around and did what the Nazis did, but to their own people. No thanks, but no.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, Holocaust denial.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Source? Never heard of this. They genocided ethnic minorities and instituted privatization, eroding worker rights?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

It’s also on Youtube.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

This you?

Kinda normal for someone who actively promotes the invasion of an allies' territorial land with the military to dislike "tankies".

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net -4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was wondering why a obviously sarcastic comment got so many downvotes. But I kind of realize every now and then that people really can't distinguish between a sarcastic one and a genuine one without the "/s" tag, even if I think it's so on the nose that I think it can't be mistaken.

I think the problem is that there are people who genuinely react like this unironically so it's safer to just take it at face value.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I didn't even watch this video.

Thanks for commenting. I miss when the big wave of redditors hadn't showed up yet...

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago

Hey all, our favorite court jester is back to entertain us!

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Now look up what peertube is.

[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What does it matter what software they use? I see that they uploaded it on this specific instance and I have to assume that they did this on purpose.

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

Because they actually uploaded it to YouTube not peertube, the tankie-tube link is just an unoffical mirror of the youtube channel.

[–] StraponStratos@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hex and .ml are two of the biggest tankie instances on the Fediverse. Worth avoiding them.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only if you want your feed to be an echo chamber. In my opinion the best thing about the fediverse is that you can choose the rules and values you want to adhere to through your instance choice, without cutting off interaction with others unless you defederate their instances.

The frequent calls to blanket dismiss anyone on those instances are an unfortunate overreaction in my opinion.

[–] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. There are some tone deaf people from those instances who think their perspectives are the only true ones, but that's true of any sufficiently large and unified group.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago

.ml is not a "tankie instance". The admins are Marxist-Leninists, so they fit some definitions of tankie, but its just a technology instance for leftists.

Hexbear isn't one either. A lot of their users are, but there are just as many who aren't, such as anarchists (basically the opposite).

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of anarchists on Hexbear, lemmygrad is explicitly ML though

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Anarchists are absolutely considered tankies at this point.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

uh no they're not? Anarchists are about as anti-government as it gets

Edit: unless you mean liberals can't tell the difference between different leftists

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Uh, yes they are?

Tankie just means anyone to the left of the US Overton window.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wikipedia

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof. More specifically, the term has been applied to those who express support for one-party Marxist–Leninist socialist republics, whether contemporary or historical. It is commonly used by anti-authoritarian leftists, including anarchists, libertarian socialists, left communists, democratic socialists and reformists to criticise Leninism, although the term has seen increasing use by liberal and right‐wing factions as well.

The only time I've seen it be applied to anarchists is when Reddit libs don't like anyone left of them doing stuff like protesting, but normally the Wikipedia definition is how I see the word used.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Have shitlibs like you ever read anything other than Wikipedia? Serious question.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't say the definition was correct because Wikipedia says so, I said that's how the word is normally defined, and the Wikipedia definition (which was the first thing that popped up) aligns with my experiences with how I've seen the word used. So when you say the word "tankie" includes anarchists, I'm wondering whose definition or what reasoning are you pulling from.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously though, have shitlibs like you read anything other than Wikipedia?

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I've read comments from people who start with a confusing statement seeming to use definitions of words that aren't commonly accepted and when asked to explain their definition resort to ad hominem and topic switching rather than defending their point that their definition is a commonly accepted use of that word.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

So I'm going to go with no, you don't read anything other than Wikipedia.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

Take your brain out for a walk sometime.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Anarchists find it really hard to support despotic regimes even when they're opposing the USA.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Lol, as opposed to those non-despotic "regimes" that you, an anarchist, believe in.

Get out of here, liberal.