this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7506 readers
455 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

tldr - donors got tax deductions so less taxes were collected ipso facto it cost more of your tax money for real things. the logic is a bit of a stretch but I don't think completely without merit.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not really. A subsidy is money dispersed, not money never collected.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah that is why I said it was a stretch. The headline is definately wrong but I get what they are saying. It is totaly sensationalist headline though since they know a real one would not get clicks. Its one reason I give the tldr so folks don't need to click.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah I appreciated it. Thank you for your service.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago

Didn’t see that one coming. /s