this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
417 points (96.9% liked)

Games

32640 readers
1674 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 29 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I will never not read "bluesky" as "bloo-skee"

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

It will always be "bluey-skibidi"

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

"Toss me a bluesky, there feller."

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 12 points 7 hours ago

Mom!

Dad!

Bingo!!

Bluesky!!!

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

So how can I follow them from Mastodon?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

This is my question too. Search results turn up Bridgy Fed, but that seems to require the account you're interested in following to go through those steps, which none of the accounts I'm interested in are doing. At least the Threads POTUS account turned on federation so I can view it from Mastodon, but I suspect for the next four years, that account will be pretty quiet, and if it isn't, I'll probably want it to be.

[–] mke@programming.dev 158 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

You could say Bluesky is... picking up Steam, eh?

Sorry, I have no new or interesting insights to offer, I'd hope most already get what's happening, anyway.

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Don't worry about not having any insights, I still valve-ued the pun.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 11 points 7 hours ago

It's nice to see other people enjoy the pun. Would be shame for it to be left4dead

[–] x3x3@lemm.ee 12 points 9 hours ago (4 children)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Can you explain the benefits of the fediverse over a centralized private site to a regular person in 5-second quip that will convince them that the relative complexity of using the fediverse versus BlueSky is worth the effort?

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Centralized and private = enshitification

Self hosted and federated = not prone to enshitification

Idk how simple it has to be for people but clearly I'm over estimating people

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Okay. Now, explain the concept of enshitification. And do it using terms that regular folk won't find crass.

You know how conservatives live in this bubble where they don't even see their racism because it's so normalized? We're interacting within a bubble where everyone has a very high level of technical competence versus the average person, so we fail to understand just how tech illiterate others are.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 55 minutes ago

Company focus on profit. even if mean overall experience get not gooder

I dumbed it down to caveman speech for those that still wouldn't understand. It's a simple concept all of use that have used the Internet in the past year have experienced.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can you explain the benefits of the fediverse over a centralized private site to a regular person in 5-second quip that will convince them that the relative complexity of using the fediverse versus BlueSky is worth the effort?

Billionares with mega yacht fleets are choosing bluesky over mastodon.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Like it or not, a regular person doesn't give two shits about that.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Talk for yourself, the average person does indeed care about the environment. In the past years there have been massive greenwashing campaigns from companies trying to please the average customer.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah because it doesn't cost them anything to say they "do their part" when they make token "commitments". It's not because the average person gives a shit. Give them a choice - $5 more an hour, or instantly and forever solve climate change and see how many people would choose climate change.

People complain about having to sort trash before throwing it out. Saying "most people care about the environment" is extremely naive.

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 hour ago

5-second quip

Someone like Musk is impossible here

Freedom from tyrants, maybe

[–] Jeffool@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It gives space to do servers based on specific interests if you want. I'm part of a game development server, and my "Local" tab has people on my server often talking about, and showing, things that are related to game development. And I can still follow anyone from any other Mastodon server too.

If you're into video games, film, maybe a specific genre of music, you can have an instance dedicated to that. (It might already exist.) It's like a virtual neighborhood, or forum. Remember forums? Those were nice. They cultivated a sense of community which made people a little more responsible in their attitudes, it feels like. Maybe that's just nostalgia, but I like the server I'm on. It's got friendly people I can talk to without feeling the need to fill my follows with them.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes! I'm on a local regional server that is nice. I like that it's locally owned and operated, and we can talk local news and events.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh so just like Discord, why would I need something new, I already have Discord.

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 42 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Because people moved to bluesky and not to mastodon.

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Not true, Mastodon has millions of users

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

And blue sky got like 15 millions in two weeks. Look, do you really think that everyone decided to diss Mastodon? All major companies, celebrities, sport teams, you name it? Or maybe there's a more reasonable explanation why Bluesky?

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 hour ago

Look, do you really think that everyone decided to diss Mastodon? All major companies, celebrities, sport teams, you name it?

Look that's what is happening

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Their main business and source of money is a proprietary centralized platform. Mastodon is the opposite.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Because casual mainstream basic folk (non-techie) don't like the slight legwork you need to do and understand the Fediverse

I saw an article from Yahoo (Source: The Independent) last week about Bluesky's current success from Xitter refugees and it also listed other similar groups like Mastedon. What didn't surprise me is that they said Mastedon is predominantly "techie" which includes the majority of it's user base as "supernerds" with the site having the "steepest learning curve." This was an op-ed from an outsider.

Until Mastedon can appeal to simple minded mainstream basic folk (which is a pretty good size of netizens) it will always be a niche group.

[–] MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Until fediverse advocates stop thinking of people as simple minded, they will never understand the steps needed to be relevant.

The main advantage to Bluesky’s architecture is centralized identity and distributed components.

The centralized identity is key. Unless someone figures out a way to do this in activitypub, the fediverse will remain niche.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 hours ago

That's more or less what NOSTR is trying to achieve

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Octospider@lemm.ee 26 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I wonder why is Mastodon is not appealing to Valve.

[–] ahal@lemmy.ca 37 points 9 hours ago

Bluesky has 20x the user base (and the gap is growing wider every day).

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 56 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Reach?

If I wasn't on Lemmy, I wouldn't even know about Mastodon. It's not really something you hear of outside of the fediverse, in my experience. Meanwhile, BlueSky is gaining traction and talked about everywhere. Most people don't care that it's not exactly decentralized. Most of the things the users on the fediverse care about are not things the average, not-very-tech-saavy person cares about.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 20 points 9 hours ago

Bluesky has a good new user experience, too. Even if you do know about Mastodon, making an account is like"Welcome - figure it out, lol"

I'd bet if they went the other way, they'd get significantly fewer people signing up for the service...Steam caters to both nerds and casuals alike

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 21 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

I really enjoy Mastodon, but it seems to be too confusing with all the servers. I don’t know why, but maybe because people have been conditioned by big tech to use centralised services. Especially Gen Z that grew up with this very big tech controlled internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] index@sh.itjust.works -4 points 4 hours ago

Valve ceo built a billion dollars mega yacht fleet off selling proprietary games through a proprietary third party launcher. A free and open source decentralized platform does not appeal to them for obvious reasons.

[–] jonathan@lemmy.zip 42 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

And Valve and Steamdeck accounts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That's great, I suppose less concentration to a single platform is a better direction.

Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky? I would imagine whatever ills plague Twitter would also eventually come to Bluesky, because people are there. And people are people. We don't seem to have a solution to the problem - which is a specific subset of people intent on harm, and allowing them direct and wholesale access to the social fabric.

So easy nowadays to fabricate rage-inducing and follower-generating bait. No time for truth and no plan to really get there. How long before we see someone take a stab at a ministry of truth?

[–] babybus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Is there less rage and frothing at the mouth on Bluesky?

Yes, but I think that's temporary. When you have tens of millions of users, that's inevitable. Right now a lot of people are on their honeymoon periods, but I already see sprouts of negative attitude.

[–] karashta@piefed.social 15 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The block function is heavily used. Whole block lists get passed around quite frequently. I've never really seen much hate on there unless I'm clicking into something obviously heated politically. Other people may have other experiences, but the current culture there is to not engage the hate farmers and just block people instead

[–] Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Which is honestly how it should be, feeding the trolls or tolerating them is detrimental to any platform, even engaging with them to correct them is giving them fuel.

Reporting and blocking is the only way and have always been, I don't know what changed that people decided tolerating/engaging with them was being the better person.

[–] icecreamtaco@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

In the real world, you cool down hostility by talking it out. On the internet it’s the opposite, and that approach gives the village idiot a global megaphone to radicalize or enrage others with. I think mass adoption social media is new enough that we’re still figuring out how it should work.

[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Isn't it more in the real world people don't interact with close to the number of people they do on the internet, and they never encounter or avoid a lot of people which acts like a real world filter or blocklist?

Internet is like walking in a store and then being flooded with hearing the thoughts of everyone in the store like you're experiencing a telepathic attack.

[–] Ofiuco@lemmy.cafe 2 points 2 hours ago

In the real world, you cool down hostility by talking it out.

I mean... it depends, not everything can be descalated, dependes on the person, their intentions and the place.

On the internet it’s the opposite, and that approach gives the village idiot a global megaphone to radicalize or enrage others with.

Pretty much, people know how to behave or they don't... and they can learn or not, but we have no reason to tolerate the village idiots.

I think mass adoption social media is new enough that we’re still figuring out how it should work.

I remember old forums, there was no tolerance for trolls and you could get punished along the troll for feeding it, so people learned to leave them alone and just report them, good sites/forums were heavily moderated and curated.
I think it started to go down the drain when moderation/ownership was removed from the users, just like with community servers for multiplayer games, companies care only about their own interests so allowing trolls who cause engagement by bait were more than welcome, they just pretended to moderate the services.
Nowadays... well reddit punishes mods who actually moderate the subs so that's a waste of time, the fediverse seems to need to learn to just not tolerate nor engage with trolls... and the users have to learn to just report and block, just like the BlueSky users do so the mods can locate and remove the trolls (either users or servers).
I think admins/mods must be MUCH less tolerant of possible trolls and not be afraid about curating the content to their liking... it's their server/community after all.

[–] radix@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Nuclear block plus a culture of not feeding the trolls means the only toxic accounts I've run across are just a day or two old. Block and move on. The experience can only be as negative as each user lets it be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›