this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
346 points (97.8% liked)

News

23361 readers
3439 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brianary@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Do they mean "buying" instead of "owning"?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I might still not understand but... Landlords have to pay insurance as well. Why would they be the exception. They have all the same costs and also want to make a profit. How can rent be cheaper then?

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Two things: first, landlords aren't entitled to a profit, and second, landlord input costs might be completely different from an owner resident.

On the first point, if the landlord's costs are $2000/month, and the market rent for that unit is $1900/month, the landlord would rather lose $100/month on a lease than lose $2000/month on a vacant property.

On the second, it might be that the landlord bought the place when it was much cheaper, or has a much lower interest rate than what is available today. So if the landlord's costs are $2000/month for a property that would now cost $4000/month at today's purchase prices and interest rates, but can rent for $3000/month at a profit to himself.

Similarly, some volume landlords can spread certain costs around and not pay nearly as much as an owner resident. It might cost $1200 to hire a plumber to do a 6-hour job, but it also might cost $150 to simply have a plumber on the payroll to do that job, if you've got enough steady work that it's cheaper to have him around.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

It might be that a homeowner also bought home when it was cheaper. Come on, get a grip.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Because markets aren't perfectly rational. If they were perfectly efficient, no company would ever be able to make a profit at all. But we don't live in that perfect Econ 101 world, and companies can make profits because inefficiencies exist in the economy. As such, sometimes rent can be more expensive than owning.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because if you buy a house, it's just you and the bank, so you need to cover the banks risk for you as an individual, meaning higher interest rates. Larger purchases, or a group of houses are covered by different loan types, flexible rates at for example international rated plus half a point.. and that is mich cheaper. The rate might fluctuate.. but if the government strongarms the fed to keep the loans practically free, companies borrow for free plus half a point. And that is a lot of difference.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

Also, the landlord is dropping that money into an asset that often appreciates in value. As long as they otherwise have cashflow to cover it, they can afford to "lose" money each month and make a big payday when they sell it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

As a homeowner what weighs me down most is insurance, by a large margin. It keeps increasing while the coverage decreases. It's a huge racket in my opinion

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

Racket.

A racquet is what you hit your insurance adjuster with when you're tired of his racket.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Free_Opinions@feddit.uk 17 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Highly dependent on where one lives I guess. My friend just rented a new apartment and his rent is over double what my mortage payments are. That's also money he is never getting back where as in my case my house is paid in about 15 years after which I own the damn thing and the monthly mortage payment drops off entirely. Excluding mortage, the montly cost of owning my house is 275€ which includes water and electricity.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I am confused, my thought process went like this:

So it's more expensive to own then rent?

Unless you own it and rent it out to others?

Nobody would be a landlord if a dwelling cost more to maintain then to rent out.

So something doesn't add up.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

This is only looking at a point in time, not the life of the loan. In the US at least, we have fixed rate loans (many countries do not have that). So your "rent" when you mortgage a home is fixed for 30 years. When you rent, your rental costs increase with inflation every year. While it might be 14% higher to mortgage than rent right now, in a few years your mortgage will stay the same while your rent will have increased. Yes, there are repair/maintenance costs, but after 5 years or so you are saving enough per month to pay for those repairs.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When you mortgage a home as an investment property, you are leveraging your money 5-1 (on a 20% down payment)

If rent covers 90% of the mortgage, you still make an absolutely huge profit amortized over the loan.

If you consider the tax incentives (interest write off, depreciation, capital gains deferment, pass through deduction) the gap in the rent can be covered.

Consider paying 50k down on a 250k house, the. Paying an additional 15 percent over the life of the loan (around 40k) to cover for gaps in rent.

Over the life of the loan you turned 90 grand into 250 grand (and a house is an appreciating asset, so it will likely be worth more than 250 by the end of it all)

Deduct depreciation (value of the home minus land value over 27.5 years) and carry over losses can even make up for the gap of rent you pay entirely over time.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is exactly the kind of math that normal people don't get when it comes to this conversation. Every industry has some convoluted, obscure, non-intuitive way to actually make money when it doesn't sound like you should. You have to think in different ways and in longer terms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 days ago

Most landlords bought the place earlier when home prices and mortgage rates were lower, or they just own the place outright and don't make any mortgage payments.

This article is about choosing whether to buy at current rates or rent at current rates. If you bought a place 10 years ago for half the price it's worth now and a 2% interest rate then you're probably going to be paying less then renting

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago (34 children)

On paper, owning a home is almost always more expensive than renting — about 14% more, on average, after factoring in expenses like insurance, taxes, and upkeep.

I'd be interested in seeing how they arrived at the 14% number.

When I bought my first home a couple of decades ago I moved out of my 1 bedroom apartment which I was paying a monthly rent of $700/month into a small starter home with a mortgage of $1000/month. 20 years later that exact same apartment rents for $1350/month. All of the years I lived there my house payment never rose higher than the $1000/month mortgage payment while the rent on the apartment apparently continued to increase year over year. Meanwhile I ended up selling the starter home for $110,000 than my purchase prices nearly 20 years ago.

So is their 14% number just calculated on the first month of each (renting vs buying)?

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The article talks a lot about mortgages. How does the math work if you pay in full at the time of purchase?

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Renting could never compare to owning, as Equity is the biggest source of wealth for the middle class in the US. Not owning equity to pass on to your kids is one of the worst mistakes you can make. IF you can afford that sort of thing.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How have we screwed up as a society, much less species, when shelter is seen as a financial investment rather than what it is, a thing we literally need to survive?

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Well, as houses don't magically appear out of thin air, I guess it has been like this since we started building permanent shelter.

[–] bollybing@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Until relatively recently, it wasn't that uncommon to just go and find some unused land and build a house on it. No intergenerational wealth required.

[–] jaek@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

unused land

Unused by white people?

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Equity is pointless when your $30,000 roof and $20,000 HVAC break at the same time and you're taking out a 20 year home equity loan to replace them. (And good luck with the $70,000 windows.)

[–] potpotato@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (3 children)
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

Not at all, these are (roughly) prices for 2-3 bedroom single-family homes. If curious, check AIs for any reasonably successful region around the country like Raleigh, San Jose, Austin, etc. Prices are about the same. I looked up the cost for a dual system for a larger home (that would have 2x AC, 2x furnace) and that jumped to $30k-40k for HVAC. Water heater install (gas, tank) can run $800-3000 depending on the market.

Asking others for prices for windows, I think the spread was somewhere between $50k-90k, although it's been a while since I asked peeps. That's before actually going after specialty windows.

Prices have skyrocketed since the pandemic.

[–] cheesemoo@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about that - I had my roof replaced (by insurance thankfully) about a year ago, and it was ~26k. HVAC out of pocket a couple years ago was about 15k. Not fun!

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

It depends on how big your house is.

I paid $10k for a 4 ton 15 SEER AC this summer (this depends on location I suppose). I paid $13k for a normal roof replacement last year.

1600 sqft house.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

the homeowner could have an industrial HVAC system and a wooden roof

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not owning equity to pass on to your kids is one of the worst mistakes you can make.

"Oops, I guess I made the 'mistake' of not making enough money to afford the outrageous price of real estate. I guess my children deserve to be poor."

Or maybe we should treat housing as an public resource rather than an investment, and encourage the market to keep prices low for the sake of maintaining a healthy society.

[–] derfunkatron@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Leaving out the last sentence in your quoting does a disservice to what they were pointing out.

They weren’t saying anyone deserves to be poor. They weren’t saying that real estate being an investment is ideal or how it should be.

The housing market is historically, currently, and prospectively an investment, and one of the only high-return, low-risk investments available to the middle class. If you can play that game and don’t, then you are making a mistake, especially if you have kids.

[–] mohammed_alibi@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Raising your kid(s) right is better than passing any monetary wealth on to them. If they grow up knowing that they're set and will inherit your money/house, they may get lazy and just depend on that wealth. That money will be gone after the 3rd generation.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Kinda shitty that people are downvoting this. Raising your kids right includes giving them the education they need to live and acquire wealth as well, so it's not like this is wrong.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Kids? I'm not a fan of parasites

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (4 children)

you divide the amount of money that it costs by the amount of dollars you would pay to rent something like that per month and then figure that's how long it'll take for you to look at a duck instead of a chicken

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›