this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
819 points (99.3% liked)

Linux

48315 readers
1197 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PlanterTree@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Interesting how the tiny BSD fraction had a lead over Linux in 1995

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Surprised to learn that there were windows based Supercomputers.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 62 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Those were the basic entry level configurations needed to run Windows Vista with Aero effects.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I saw the thumbnail and thought this was a map of The Netherlands

[–] superkret@feddit.org 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

One of the Top 500 supercountries

[–] exu@feditown.com 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zucca@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 days ago

"Is your UNIX Linux compatible?"

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 20 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Now the real question is what package manager are they using? apt or yum? Lol

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they specifically built it to only use snaps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They are using pacman obviously :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Maybe windows is not used in supercomputers often because unix and linux is more flexiable for the cpus they use(Power9,Sparc,etc)

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (12 children)

Plus Linux doesn't limit you in the number of drives, whereas Windows limits you from A to Z. I read it here.

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You can mount drives against folders in windows. So while D: is one drive, D:\Logs or D:\Cake can each be a different disk.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 6 points 5 days ago

That's certainly a big part of it. When one needs to buy a metric crap load of CPUs, one tends to shop outside the popular defaults.

Another big reason, historically, is that Supercomputers didn't typically have any kind of non-command-line way to interact with them, and Windows needed it.

Until PowerShell and Windows 8, there were still substantial configuration options in Windows that were 100% managed by graphical packages. They could be changed by direct file edits and registry editing, but it added a lot of risk. All of the "did I make a mistake" tools were graphical and so unavailable from command line.

So any version of Windows stripped down enough to run on any super-computer cluster was going to be missing a lot of features, until around 2006.

Since Linux and Unix started as command line operating systems, both already had plenty fully featured options for Supercomputing.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

More importantly, they can't adapt Windows to their needs.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Yep the other reason.

[–] tiz@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Can we get a source for this image?

[–] superkret@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago

Sure. Added it to the post.

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (12 children)

I’m confused on why they separate BSD from Unix. BSD is a Unix variant.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 41 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Unix is basically a brand name.
BSD had to be completely re-written to remove all Unix code, so it could be published under a free license.
It isn't Unix certified.

So it is Unix-derived, but not currently a Unix system (which is a completely meaningless term anyway).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›