this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32160 readers
1249 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Senokir@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't ever let anyone forget or brush under the rug the horrible acts that occurred in Tiananmen Square on June 4th, 1989.

https://www.history.com/topics/asian-history/tiananmen-square

[–] Veritas@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemmy.ml federates with the leftist instance Lemmygrad which is the largest one. If you bring up those arguments here you are bound to get ratio'd. Perhaps you should look for a different instance and post these arguments there.

[–] Solaris1789@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why make/go to another political echo chamber over potentially getting "ratio'd" (which is meaningless and doesnt say anything about one's argument). Anyone has the right to post something no matter what people around think. Posting all this on an instance that would be INSTANTLY defederated by instances like lemmygrad is pointless and we'd just end up with less debate and more polarization.

[–] CriticalResist8@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, I just wanted to clarify something because I wasn't sure from reading your comment, but Lemmygrad federates with everyone by default, except instances that have caused us troll waves in the past. We federate with e.g. lemmy.one and beehaw.org, but they instantly blocked us on day one.

[–] ImOnADiet@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

We do also block the nazis

[–] Senokir@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No thanks. I don't give a fuck about getting ratio'd. Let the people decide. Assuming this platform ever gets more traction, which it seems to be doing, the vast majority of the people that come here won't be tankies so... no, no I don't think I will go somewhere else.

[–] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These people really want their echo chamber, not a good look for Lemmy imo

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

echo chamber? youre the one echoing western corporate media narrative.

[–] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have done no such thing lol. I’ve made two comments one making fun of the guy that said china isn’t part of world news and this one. Your comment trying to paint me in this light just reeks of desperation or the inability to read

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry let me clarify. By 'you' I mean the influx of users with a predominantly western liberal mindset.

[–] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

So posting one article about china bad is an influx of new users with a predominantly western liberal mindset echoing the corporate media narrative. Seems like a bit of a reach.

If someone posted some bad shit about USA nobody would give af and would mostly agree, you just seem like you don’t want anything critical of china

[–] balerion@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Hey, tankies, decent countries don't have to violently suppress their populations and then lie about it. Oh, and socialism is worker ownership of the means of production, not whatever the fuck they're doing in China.

(inb4 people assuming I must support the US since I hate China)

[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All states are fundamentally violent, what are you imagining to be a "decent" country where there is no violence by the state?

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a difference between a country that has a monopoly on violence and can use that for enforcement, compared to a state that responds to people just making their voices heard with cannons and guns. A cat nipping my fingers is annoying. A lion gnawing my head off is deadly.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The crackdown wasn't against the peaceful protestors who they let just kind of do their thing under supervision for somewhere around 6 weeks despite it basically being the equivalent of the section of Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House. The CPC became less friendly as it became aware of NED bullshit and, critically, unarmed soldiers being immolated and lynched by militants who were using naive protestors as cover. The CPC nonetheless gave everyone some time to clear out (I forget the time table but I think it was 24 - 72 hours) and even once it was over the deadline they didn't just start blasting.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem with this is that we don't really know if it's true. It's the CPC's official story, but they've created an atmosphere so hostile to truth or transparency that it's not trustworthy.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

See, this is a sort of epistemic nihilism that is used for question-begging the western narrative. I give you a counterproposition and you say "Well the CPC is so untrustworthy that we just can't know that that's true!"

Which part do you doubt? That the protest had been going on for many weeks? We have contemporaneous reports. That the CPC wasn't very hostile to the protestors for most of that period? We have footage of the protestors and unarmed soldiers coexisting -- sometimes even having something of a fun time together, each group singing songs!

We have photographs of the lynched corpses, with the protestors idly looking on (because what else could they do?). We have contemporaneous reporting on the CPC setting a deadline for the square to be fled. We have footage of one of the more radical student leaders, Chai Ling, saying that she will deliberately direct her clique to stay (even as she flees) so that they will shed blood.

We have a smaller amount of footage of the night itself, but that tells us many things. For example, there was a protestor (not a student) who was on a high-profile hunger strike. He negotiated the peaceful evacuation of a group of students who didn't quite realize what they were signing up for by staying. We also have some distant footage of the fighting in the surrounding area (because the square itself didn't see violence, as even western journalists confirmed).

The 1984 narrative Reddit spoonfeeds people is incredibly flimsy, even if all you do is look at reporting from Brits, Americans, and Germans.

Speaking of, have you ever watched the full Tank Man video? You can find it on Youtube quite easily. If you haven't seen it, please do me a favor and predict what happens and write it down for yourself -- no need to show anyone else, myself included. Then, watch what happens and compare that to your guess. I think you will find it to be an interesting exercise.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Decent countries. What a slippery slope for supremacist thoughts.

[–] balerion@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Lol. Thinking some countries have better governments than others is supremacist? Whatever, dude.

By the way. If there are any countries with decent governments, I don't know of them. But like. If there were decent countries, they wouldn't behave like China.

[–] Solaris1789@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow a post on lemmy denouncing the CCPs actions instead of denying them or even trying to justify them? Thats rare

[–] Senokir@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I plan on actively posting to counter the constant barrage of tankie propaganda that is very clearly an issue here. Misinformation is a very real issue that we face in our society and unless we actually do something about it, it will only continue to get worse.

[–] sovietsnake@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is a very real issue so it'd be nice if you'd stopped doing it yourself. Also this is not world news, this is a China news, world news is not whatever the US and its European eunuchs oppose to.

[–] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also this is not world news, this is a China news,

Is china not part of the world? lmao

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not saying there can’t be news about China, what I’m saying, and I’ve seen this a multitude of times, is that there is something that Usonians and Europeans do a lot, is that they post news about their countries as if they would be the world. In my book “World News” means something the entire world should care about, not just the Anglosphere and Europe, the description seems just a silly thing to put as a placeholder, at least that’s how it has always worked in this community, news that the entire world cares about. It is a good rule that something global would involve at least 2 countries, or some event that it is really worth mentioning, like a natural disaster in some country, etc.

[–] xTechDeath@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

times, is that there is something that Usonians and Europeans do a lot, is that they post news about their countries as if they would be the world. In my book “World News” means something the entire world should care about, not just the Anglosphere and Europe, the description seems just a silly thing to put as a placeholder, at least that’s how it has always worked in this community, news that the entire world cares about. It is a good rule that something global would involve at least 2 countries, or some event that it is really worth mentioning, like a natural disaster in some country, etc.

A simple glance at the news articles being posted here is a direct contradiction to all of this, where are you in those those threads?

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not post about the atrocities committed by the USA and their allies on their anniversaries then?

Might get exhausting posting every day.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure I've seen many reports of the USA jailing or disappearing its own citizens when they dare speak up about said atrocities.

[–] gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, like Julian Assange? Who's that guy? No idea. Oh, maybe you meant Chelsea Manning, ah, no, also don't know who's that one.

[–] jeena@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, Julian is not USA's "own citizen".

[–] soulless@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having been a life long socialist myself, it's a bit mystifying to me how anyone can believe that the atrocities commited by the US somehow makes the PRC or Russia in any way deserving of praise.

For sure I'd like more people to call out the American genocide of its natives, or honor the heroes that fought for their emancipation during the time of chattel slavery.

But I'll be damned if any of those atrocities will make me defend the human suffering caused by the Chinese or Russian regimes. To me, being a socialist means standing up for the little guy, judging a society by how we care for those who have the least. The only us vs them struggle there is, is the one between the working and the ruling class - not the one between east and west. Idolising Zedong only puts another Emperor on a pedestal. I say fuck them all, western or eastern rulers and billionaires, they're the real enemies of a social and equal world.

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a propaganda push in the west to demonize China, with the obvious goal of creating consent for a potential war. Even the Trotskyists of wsws.org (which have no favorable view of China) usually defend China from fake or misleading shit. Repeating US propaganda uncritically, or even criticizing China for good reason without proper context, is helping the US propaganda machine bring us to the brink of annihilation.

It's important to be truthful and fair, and not encourage sinophobia and war propaganda, so be careful when criticizing China.

[–] soulless@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whether it's China or really anything, I'd agree to being critical of any claims made without proper context, yet the context here is the massacre and subsequent cover-up perpetrated by the Chinese government following peaceful protests on the Tiananmen square.

Meeting that with whataboutisms and vague excuses is disrespectful towards the victims full stop.

Being a socialist should be easy, because truth is on our side. It should be easy to point to Tiananmen square and say "this is what happens when the ruling class feels threatened", just like you can say the same thing when the US government busts their unions or murders their black citizens. Being an unquestioning supporter of either of these regimes is not what socialism is to me, and it never was. I just don't understand how anyone can reconcile these opposing views in their heads.

[–] nahoskins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow. There's a lot of CCP folks working the federated space.

[–] FaceDeer@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of the big instances, Lemmygrad, is basically dedicated to that crowd. If the influx of Reddit refugees doesn't counterbalance them then at some point I'll probably move to an instance that doesn't federate with them.

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I've already done the same, can recommend it

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen?

[–] gzrrt@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meanwhile in Taiwan, the island's equivalent of the Tiananmen massacre from the KMT dictatorship (the 228 incident) has its own memorial park and museum.

No need for a self-inflicted legitimacy crisis when you respect your citizens' basic rights.

[–] elouboub@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I understand China's reactions here... if nothing happened, then why not just let them congregate and "remember" something that supposedly didn't happen? What's the harm? If they were blocking traffic or riots were involved, it would understandable to want to stop it, but if it's peaceful, where's the harm? Unless of course, something did happen that they want people to forget...

[–] peeonyou@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

an unknown number of deaths... yet calls it a massacre

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a large number, but it's hard to tell how large because the CPC keeps that information tightly under wraps. The official statement claimed just 200, but recently declassified diplomatic cables from the UK give an estimate of 10,000 dead (source). The original source was inside China's State Council. It's important to remember that the actions taken that day were far from universally supported even inside the party. There was a massive purge afterward of officials that were deemed to be sympathetic to the protestors.

Edit: This estimate likely has fog of war issues itself, though, since it was sent so shortly after the massacre. Other estimates are far lower, but still much higher than the official figures. The CPC does not want to admit the extent that it screwed up and killed its own citizens.