this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
97 points (97.1% liked)

News

23019 readers
3446 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

When faced with these requests, DoorDash customer service reps would ask for some form of verification. The indictment states that the men would use the personal information of the Dasher, such as their phone number, date of birth, recent transactions, or even the last four digits of their driver’s license, to authenticate themselves.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Why is this theft from the employees, not the employer?

If your work hands your paycheck to a stranger, they still owe you money.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

because Corpos are the largest thieves around. by dollar amount, wage theft and other white collar financial crimes are vastly more common than strong-arm robberies, or getting mugged on the street. (also pretty sure that it happens more frequently, too. but we can't know that because it's hardly enforced at all.)

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree with none of this - but we need to reject that normalization. If DoorDash is unable to recover all the stolen funds they - not the drivers - should be on the hook for making up the difference.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

it's straight up wage theft. Door dash owes the drivers. they gave money to fraudsters, that's on them.

I get taken by a fake IRS agent scam, i still owe my taxes. I get taken by a fake banker, I still owe the bank.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago

You’re completely right. They probably only did this to avoid a lawsuit:

“We [DoorDash] have closely cooperated with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice on their investigation, and we are grateful for their efforts and work. We have fully supported all the Dashers impacted by this fraud, including reimbursing them any earnings taken,” the spokesperson said.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, DoorDash needs to pay its fucking delivery drivers and, once that's done, it can consider pursuing the thieves to recoup their losses.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

They also outright stole tips.

They way they did that was deduct from the delivery fee. So if the fee was 10 dollars and you tip five, they take five from the fee that would normally go to the driver.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io -3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If your work hands your paycheck to a stranger, they still owe you money.

That's not how these platforms work. They're not the employer of the driver. The drivers are independent contractors, which means they're not on payroll and they don't get a paycheck. They get untaxed earnings, which are held in their DoorDash account until they transfer them to their bank. Legally, DoorDash's responsibility ends once they credit the driver's account, because it's up to the drivers to not get phished.

Obviously, you can make arguments over the ethics of independent contract work in general, but this distinction is important to take note of, as independent contractors don't have the same benefits or protections that employees would, and there are much different legal processes involved.

DoorDash owes their employees money, not excuses.

Read the article:

[DoorDash] also said it has reimbursed or tried to reimburse workers who were stolen from.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 15 hours ago
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

"because it's up to the drivers to not get phished. "

The drivers were not phished, Doordash the company was.

If I do work for a client, send my invoice by mail, that mail gets intercepted by a scammer, that scammer sends on an altered invoice with their bank account number on it, and the client sends a bank transfer to the scammer ... Then the client still owes me money and they still have to pay my real invoice (to me), irregardless of whether or not they manage to reclaim the money that they paid to the scammer.

The technology may have changed, but the same principles apply.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

“Independent contractor” is a legal fiction to abuse their workers.

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago

I hope I get to see in my lifetime, tech bro companies held to the employment standards old school business once was.

Ain't holding my breath, though.

[–] gex@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

DoorDash would ask the men for selfies to prove their identity as the Dasher before changing the account information. In response, they would send pictures of themselves.

Top notch security right there

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Made me think of this. Pretty much thr exact scenario, as a Mitchell and Web sketch.

Mitchell Web - Identity theft

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -2 points 1 day ago

Men. Not women.