this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
449 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59651 readers
2646 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 108 points 1 month ago (3 children)

So... Almost every single video pre switch besides speed running videos? Where the fuck else are they supposed to play them? By the time "let's plays" we're popular on YouTube we were in the time of the Wii or even passed it. And even if they didn't emulate, they'd have to have bought the console off eBay where Nintendo makes zero money from the discontinued consoles. This is literally just control for the sake of control and it's why I hate Nintendo.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don’t like Nintendo’s attack on emulation any more than you do, but video capture cards have existed for a long time. You don’t need an emulator to record footage of console play

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

It's more about accessibility. It's not like they make the games anymore and the emulators they have on the Switch are lackluster. You could buy shit on eBay but if it's a super niche game it'd probably cost a lot of money. Money that doesn't go back to Nintendo. It's not like they're going to lose money for someone playing a super rare game on an emulator.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tabular@lemmy.world 70 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you paid for it then it's your game - not their game.

(Don't care if you ripped it yourself or not)

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like everything these days, ten bucks says "Naw you licensed it" with all these conditions attached.

Corporate fine print is so out of control in the 21st century.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These days it's all about the Retroactively Amended Personal Experience: changing the terms after the sale.

I have altered the deal, pray I do not alter it further.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Pretty much. There was something I read the other day about Uber drivers and liability in car accidents. Another wild read.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 51 points 1 month ago (3 children)

From the article:

However, there will be some who argue that these emulation handhelds – which often come pre-loaded with hundreds of games without paying the copyright holders a single penny – are legally dubious at the best of times, and Nintendo is well within its rights to try and shut down any outlet which promotes them.

That is absurd. The copyright holders make nothing regardless, as the games are not for sale anymore.

Switch emulation is definitely up for debate. But hardware and games that are no longer made? Come on now…

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 1 month ago

Guess you can't even show videos of legitimate Classics Library content on a real Switch since those are being emulated. 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Regardless of the legality of the action or the product itself, a video reviewing, showing or reporting on it shouldn't be passable of a copyright claim.

Even if the video shows copyrighted material, it still shouldn't be allowed for Nintendo to claim it, as that would fall under fair use. Just showing a few screenshots of a video game for the purposes of education in an otherwise unrelated video would never fall under copyright infringement.

The piracy argument has nothing to do with Nintendo claiming a video as their own, despite them having no rights to do so.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Boom! That's the case. But what YouTuber can stand against Nintendo in court?

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

these emulation handhelds – which often come pre-loaded with hundreds of games

I can only speak for the retroid pocket I have. It's not far off from a stock android phone, sans camera and modem, plus d-pad and sticks.

It only came preloaded with a few open source emulators available on play store for free in addition to GApps (with official play store support).

[–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Anbernic devices in particular are known to ship with an SD card that's preloaded with a fairly large game library. I own a RG351M which did indeed include a cheap card loaded with both the OS and a collection of games by Nintendo, Sega, and many others, plus some strange rom hacks. I immediately swapped that card out for a better one with a better CFW and my own files.

Most other notable names in the emulation handhelds space like Retroid, Ayn, and Ayaneo expect users to be able to provide their own files instead, which I'd say makes more sense.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This is getting to the point where it goes to court and rightfully, Nintendo should get slapped and a new bleem-like precedent is set.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I have heard that Nintendo has never lost a lawsuit which is a real shame if true.

[–] MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not. They've definitely lost lawsuits before.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Damn, Alex Navarro from Nextlander let me down then. Or I’m misremembering completely which is entirely possible.

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw a similar comment in the last week or so (might have been on TikTok?) but it was specifically Japanese court that they'd said they'd never lost in. I don't know if it's accurate though, took it at face value and didn't really think much about it.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Japanese courts have a 99% conviction rate or something. Saying you've not lost in a Japanese court is like saying 99% of the time you've been to the airport, you got on a plane.

That's the case for most people

[–] pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

In criminal cases. In civil suits someone always loses, so an average person cannot win more than 50% of cases.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 44 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I won't be buying a single Nintendo product then. Fuck 'em.

I'm going to boycott them the same way I've boycotted Sony ever since one of their CDs bricked my PC with their stupid rootkit.

[–] LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What rootkit? I wasn't aware of this.

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They’re probably talking about the BMG rootkit from the early 2000’s. Basically, when you inserted a Sony CD into your computer, it would automatically and silently install a rootkit on your PC, which introduced a backdoor on your PC that was being actively exploited. It was also notoriously difficult to remove, as it would reinstall itself even if you deleted every visible trace of it (and improperly installing it could disable access to your CD drive entirely.)

Then when shit hit the fan and Sony was making headlines for it, they released a “fix” for it. The fix didn’t actually remove the rootkit, and simply hid files with specific names (the rootkit files) from the users. This only introduced another vulnerability, where hackers could just name any virus the same as the rootkit, and it would automatically be hidden.

It led to several very large lawsuits and state investigations. Sony was raked over the coals by multiple state attorneys general, and the FTC even published warnings urging consumers not to buy Sony CDs.

All in the name of DRM. The rootkit was initially meant to stop you from ripping and copying the CD. Oh, and the rootkit contained sections of improperly credited open source code. So Sony stole from OSS programmers while claiming that they were trying to prevent IP theft.

[–] LucidBoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Wow, that is actually apalling...

[–] Deconceptualist@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Retro Games Corps got hit, even though Russ only does legal emulation and backups. It's his "2nd strike" on YouTube (3rd is channel deletion). He's always been mindful of the situation and considerate of not spoiling games or encouraging anything close to piracy from what I've seen.

Source: Nerd Nest where he often guests.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A lot of those emulators, specially the SNES ones, make games better if not outright bearable. There's a lot of games that I could not have completed without spending an absurd amount of time on them without saved states. The Nintendo games out there aren't even exceptionally good, there are plenty of indie alternatives if people give them a chance. It's biggest plus is that the brand does act in a way many AAA publishers fail to do, an assurance of a basic degree of quality fun.

[–] turtletracks@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

UFO 50 has solved my crave for the old Nintendo games, highly recommended

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep! Feels like going through a rom pack or multi-cart and only finding good games.

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The complete opposite of action 52, perfection

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This might be the thing that pushes me into not buying Nintendo games anymore. I've always liked them despite the legal crap, but god damn.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nintendo doesn't want you to play their games if you're not willing to follow their rules. Ok, that's their prerogative, but that means I will not be playing their games...at least not their new ones.

I prefer playing on my Steam Deck these days, and I really don't want to buy another handheld just to play Nintendo first party titles. I'm going to play some of my favorite classic Nintendo titles on my Deck using emulators and just not play the new stuff. I'm sure they're great games, but so what? There are lots of great games. I've got a huge backlog of great games already in my Steam library, and 20 more on my wishlist. If Nintendo some day decides to make their titles available for Steam Deck or PC, I'd consider buying them, but since that's extremely unlikely to happen, I think I'm just done with Nintendo.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Nintendo doesn't want you to play their games if you're not willing to follow their rules.

They don’t want you to play their games at all, seeing as they’re not selling them anymore.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is kinda like a advertisement that game emulation is at the point where it works as well as the consoles. The more attention this gets the more people will see this. I quit consoles a long time ago but its clear that they are not going to force anyone to purchase their products and its more likely that they will just drive people toward these emulators.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

They're going to have a real big problem with this one because playing the games on an emulator isn't illegal so first they need to prove they don't own a legit copy and they need to figure that out before bringing suit.

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I wish that I had enough drawing skills to do this, but:

Imagine obese (morbidly so) versions of Mario and Pikachu. Both with blood on their mouths, and faces that strongly remind Goya's "Saturn Devouring His Son". Mario holds half of the body of a dead Tanzee (a Palworld pal), and is strongly implied to be eating it; Pikachu does it with the Yuzu logo, or something else.

There are only three things written in the whole picture.

  • Top right corner: Nintendo's logo.
  • Centre bottom: "we were starving", followed by "私たち二人は飢えていました。" (ditto; might as well check the grammar as I don't speak JP, I used a machine translator).
[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Sounds like a prompt for generative AI to sink its teeth into.

edit: Here's a starting point if someone with photochop skills wants to bring it to the finish line.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DesolateMood@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Pikachu eating ryujinx (which just got taken down today)

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

playing nintendo games, on a pc, using a dualshock feels so wrong and yet so right

[–] PunchingWood@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They're really just gonna Order 66 this whole thing huh

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I'm done with Nintendo.

[–] Toes@ani.social 3 points 1 month ago

Splatoon is so much better on PC.