this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
73 points (92.9% liked)

Linux

47544 readers
713 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've noticed a general sentiment that printing on Linux is (or at least was) extremely cumbersome and difficult. Why is that?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 16 hours ago

thats just cuz printers generally suck

[–] kuneho@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

my experience is that through network, it's just flawless. I turned on my printer and sure there it was. (though this feature just became a huge issue recently :P)

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

I use printer with a USB personally. No issues with that but I got an HP printer that is really weird with the network stuff

[–] signofzeta@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 19 hours ago

Are you old enough to remember Winmodems and NDISWrapper? There used to be some hardware that was so cheap that the Windows driver needed to do some of the basic work. They were never compatible with anything but Windows (and maybe 98 or XP at that). I’m sure there were some printers like that.

Combined with poor driver support early on, and a lack of standards (at least on the consumer end), and the need to have a separate PPD file for every make and model of printer, and printing used to be a mess. (It almost got bad again when Microsoft tried pushing their XPS format as a replacement for PostScript, PCL, PDF, and EPS, but that didn’t catch on.)

Apple buying CUPS (and hiring its lead developer) was great for the community. They got it working all but perfectly. I’ve never had a problem printing on Linux; HP, Brother, or otherwise.

FYI: the developer quit Apple and forked his project into OpenCUPS, but I haven’t tried that.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

If you have a hp printer they got a official software for it

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I haven't used a new printer or an inkjet in a number of years now, but using my 18yo HP laserjet is a matter of plugging it in and checking it's status under the main distro settings menu. That was also on par with the windows process iirc.

I do remember 20 years ago when I had to sideload pcmcia wifi drivers, though.

[–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

True, i have 20yo hp inkjet and 17yo epson inkjet, old printers work like a charm on linux and you can refill them with standard medical syringe too

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is way easier than anything else.

[–] brianary@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This was also my recent experience on PopOs!

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

I just started with PopOS a couple years ago. I'm not a power user. I've got one of those crappy travel printers. I think it's Canon? I forget. It worked just fine for me.

[–] Baaahb@feddit.nl 81 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's not been my experience.

Granted, printers suuuuuck. But I was legit surprised when both the printing and scanning functions in Linux were hands down better than windows.

[–] HowlsSophie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

SAME. Everything prints faster and worked well from day one.

[–] eutampieri@feddit.it 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We raise our CUPS to your pun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mactan@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

my printer spits out page upon page of random characters and mess when I try to print from my desktop, gave up and use my phone now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 days ago

I think that used to be the case more than it is now. Linux now uses the same printing system (CUPS) as macOS, and macOS printing has to work or Apple's customers would be unsatisfied.

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 days ago

Is printing cumbersome and difficult on Linux? Yes, it can be. Is it better than Windows? Also yes.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

HP Laser 107w, driverless, over LAN.

I just Ctrl+P from any software and it prints.

It also prints programmatically (for e.g. folk.computer ) thanks to IPP.

I didn't have to "think about printing" since I have that setup so I don't know where you get that sentiment.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nyan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

It used to be much, much more difficult than it is today, but your experiences will still vary according to what type of printer you have. The problem is drivers. There are still printers out there that have no working Linux driver (mostly old, non-Postscript-supporting, with no Mac drivers either). Some will work with a generic driver, but some features aren't available. The more annoying case is the one where the manufacturer put out a driver once, many years ago, it doesn't work properly with modern versions of CUPS, and they can't be arsed to revise it.

But most printers these days will do basic one-sided 100%-size prints out of the box, and that's all many people need.

[–] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 6 points 2 days ago

Printing on Linux has been seamless for me so far, unlike windows and macos

[–] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Any problem I've ever had printing is almost exclusively a problem with the printer, it's usually yellow or cyan. Doesn't matter the document is black&white.

[–] gomp@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 days ago

It used to back in the day, especially if you tried using shitty windows usb inkjets.

Nowadays basically all printers are network printers (they are, aren't they?) plus we have cups which is the same thing macos uses (so manufacturers actually care).

[–] slembcke@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Anecdotally Windows is the only platform I've used where printing (and scanning) didn't tend to "just work". The only issue I've had printing under Linux was with a second hand printer my dad got that we couldn't get to print from any computer. (shrug)

[–] Unmapped@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I noticed this too. In theprimeagens recent video on cups problem they kept making jokes about printing on Unix. I think I must be lucky or something cause so far every printer I have setup on Linux has been easier then having to download all the bloatware to make them work on windows. But I have only done about 6 printers so far on Linux.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I also like not getting ads from printer companies

Because printing in Linux both works and is supported and not supported and hope that there are drivers and they work.

For example, I have a brother printer and in both arch and Ubuntu/mint the printer worked out of the box. But I was missing features like double sided printing. So I had to download drivers for it.

In arch the drivers were on the AUR, so I was printing is seconds.

In Ubuntu/mint they weren’t in my package manager, so I had to go to brother’s website and hope they had drivers. Brother did and while it took a bit it did work too. No worse than windows.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An u until live CD will find my decade old HP laser and print to it without any work.

Getting my NIXOS to print at the same printer? About an hour.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Anything on Nix takes a long time

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 1 points 18 hours ago

I did have a weird issue with my printer under nix, turns out it was a bug. I guess 1h time investment is about right.

But that also meant that my Laptop and my GF's PC were a 0 seconds time investment.

I think that's neat :D

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I kind of like that aspect of it... Is that wrong?

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, it is highly reproducible. I think the idea of Nix OS isn't bad. I actually looked into it for Samba as deploying software on Nix is easy. The problem is that it doesn't scale well.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think Nix is the future. I feel like at some point we could have fedora ublue for all distros by using nix with GUI configs.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago

I can't see that happening but you never know

[–] Apalacrypto@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I’m not sure on this one, but it may depend on the printer. Printing on Linux for me has been the easiest process ever. Windows fights me at every corner, but Linux sees my network printers and they just work out of the box. (I’ve only used Brother printers for the last 20 years)

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 9 points 2 days ago

IDK, my housemates printer required literally 0 setup to work with my linux VM and I've never had an issue. When I print from windows it's a pain in the butt sometimes.

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago

Printing has basically everywhere been annoying. You need(-ed) specific drivers or even apps to make it work and if you have that set up it still can be annoying. And because most of these drivers/apps don’t support Linux printing relied on reverse engineered drivers. Then CUPS came around which made things better. And when apple adopted CUPS for Mac suddenly everyone wanted to support.

If you are really interested check out this episode of destination Linux where it’s discussed in detail.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 7 points 2 days ago

It was terrible in the 90's. Since CUPS became standard around 2000 it's significantly easier.

[–] papafoss@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I only print docs and pictures. But in my opinion printing on Linux is largely better than Windows. It just works most of the time. And if there is an issue the solution is generally restarting the job.

[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

As long as your printer is supported, it's not difficult. The problem is that if you need advanced options, like artists need usually, the options aren't there.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Dunno, I own the cheapest Ink Jet HP sells and setup is much faster on Linux than via their drivers on Windows.
Gnome Scanner also wipes the floor with any scanning application from HP/MSFT

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

NAPS2 is good for Windows

load more comments
view more: next ›