this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
460 points (99.4% liked)

World News

38714 readers
2345 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Prices have risen by 54% in the United States, 32% in China and nearly 15% in the European Union between 2015 and 2024. Though policies have been implemented to increase supply and regulate rentals, their impact has been limited and the problem is getting worse

Housing access has become a critical issue worldwide, with cities that were once accessible reaching unsustainable price points. Solutions that have been proposed, like building more houses, capping rents, investing in subsidized housing and limiting the purchase of properties by foreigners have not stemmed the issue’s spread. Between 2015 and 2024, prices rose by 54% in the United States, 32% in China and by nearly 15% in the European Union (including by 26% in Spain), according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

...

Salaries have not grown apace with real estate prices. In the EU, the median rent rose by 20% between 2010 and 2022, with rental and purchase prices growing by up to 48%, according to Eurostat. Underregulated markets are wreaking havoc, and in the United States and Spain, 20% of renters spend more than 40% of their income on housing, while in France, Italy, Portugal and Greece, that percentage varies between 10% and 15%, according to the OECD. Many countries have created programs aimed at increasing the future supply of public housing, but their effectiveness has yet to be determined and analysts say that results will be limited if smarter regional planning decisions are not made.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Hey, here’s a thought: outside of banks holding the deed in the context of mortgages, corporations aren’t allowed to own residential properties for perma-renting purposes.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The prices are set by banks. The only limit on what somebody can sell you a house for is what the bank is prepared to lend you.

If the interest rates go down, the price goes up. If the term lengths go up, the price goes up. Prevent lending, and the landlords will buy it up because normal people can no longer afford them.

The system has been fucked for way too long, and in order to fix it, you're going to have to upset a lot of people who have put their money into their home.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 167 points 4 days ago (20 children)

We need to stop using the term "middle class."

Back in the day, middle class meant Archie Bunker/Al Bundy supporting a family of four with one job.

Today it's two college graduates struggling to keep up with the bills.

We're in Tsarist Russia; a huge mass of serfs, a small set of professionals, and an aristocracy that controls 90% of the wealth.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like you’re saying that the actual middle class is a small set of professionals at the upper end of what we generally call the “middle class?” And that 90% of people are actually working class? That seems like a really sensible interpretation. I mean, if you don’t own your home and can’t build significant savings, you are living pretty close to hand-to-mouth. And that’s a lotttttt of people these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The middle class has always been a myth to get people to work harder and for a homogenized society where everyone’s got that “all-American” family with a white picket fence. We can once again blame fucking Henry Ford. See Ford’s sociological department for the literal enforcement of this ideal in exchange for his touted “$5 a day!” lure. Company people came around to your house to check what you were eating, how you were dressed, how your kids were doing in school, and if you were an immigrant, how assimilated you were becoming and if it was acceptably quick enough.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 31 points 3 days ago (19 children)

No. There actually was a time when you could have a pretty good life with a simple job.

Look up "Hells Angel's" by Hunter Thompson. There's a chapter where he runs down the economics of dropping out circa 1970. A biker could work a Union stevedore job for six months and earn enough to live on the road for two years. A part time waitress could support herself and her musicain boyfriend.

That was before Nixon started printing paper dollars to pay for Vietnam and Ronald Reagan cut taxes for the rich.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Basic, modern human needs such as housing, healthcare, education, nutrition, utilities (electricity, internet, water & sewage), and transportation should never be a means of profit. As with everything, there is a cost to maintaining these systems and to profit off of them inherently means diverting resources away from these systems that serve our society into the pocket of an individual.

[–] zeroday@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 3 days ago (25 children)

There is no middle class - there is the working class and the exploiter class. People have misidentified a chunk of the relatively better off working class as somehow not part of the working class. Over time the systems of capitalism and the power imbalances at the heart of the non-unionized workplace will eventually reduce better off workers to the lowest common denominator as the exploiter class demands perpetually growing profit that must come at the cost of the working class.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 71 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Stop letting corporations gobble up single family homes.

Stop letting multi-home owners buy and buy and buy.

Tax vacant homes.

You'll have to convince the politicians to give up their real estate portfolios. Address the fact that politicians are allowed to profit off of insider trading and policy making that directly affects their other investments, then we might see some willingness to go after the Blackrocks and Vanguards.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 11 points 3 days ago

I subscribe to the newsletter for BIG by Matt Stoller and he's been writing about corporate slumlords and housing cartels lately. Shit's fucked.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Supply and demand. Stop letting people (or corporations) buy more than one house and watch prices fall. I own a home, and I’m perfectly willing to see it lose value in order to avoid seeing my country turn into some modern feudalistic hellhole.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My condo has gone up at least $100k in value since I bought it just before shit went crazy, but that value is meaningless if I can’t afford to capitalize on it and move anywhere. I feel like I’m basically trapped in this house, since everything else has gone up so much more than my place.

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Same. If Zillow is correct my house is worth 90k more than we paid for it, but I can’t sell it because everything else went up with it, and I’m locked into a stupid low interest rate. It’s like someone gave me a beer that never gets empty, but I also have to hold it forever. If I want to switch to a different drink I’m shit outta luck, but I can’t really complain because I always have the beer 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (1 children)

At some point we need to have a grown up conversation about the finite nature of land, specifically land that people can live on and find work from.

This "the rich make up the rules and lets pretend land will never run out" nonsense clearly isn't working for anyone but the rich.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

A lot of this was already talked about by the traditional Left, way back in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The discussion back then was all about Power, and by that I mean the capacity of forcing or blocking others from doing what they want, not just the version of "Power" talked about the useful idiots nowadays which only sees the Power of the State, never the Power that comes from Money and Ownership.

This is why some of the suggested solutions they came up with back then explicitly involved things like Confiscating the Means Of Production and Land Reform, which, whether one agrees or not with it, at least recognized and tried to address the Power inherent in the Ownership of that which is needed to produce things for the rest.

The problem is that the supposedly Leftwing (but really mostly Liberal and not even honestly so) thinking since at least the 80s pointedly avoids talking about the Power Of Money as if people's life's aren't shaped by access to a place to live, access to food, access to healthcare and the time they have to spend working being defined by how little of the product of their work ends up in their hands, none of which is trully their choice nowadays.

Maybe we should start again looking back at some of the best things from back then, such as Social Democracy.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just want to point out, EU inflation rate from 2015 - 2024 is a 12% change, so out of the 3 examples listed only the EU has had stable prices. Technically housing prices went down in some EU countries based on this information, like Portugal. And EU inflation has gone down since the 2022 spike, which means there was a tiny housing bubble in 2022.

This only applies to housing prices of course - rent is a different story so being addressed in different ways across different EU members.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's affecting the working poor worse. the middle class can still afford rent far easier.

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Middle class isn't real. Everybody (perhaps over a certain age) thinks they are the middle class. There are those who own the factories, farms, offices, etc. And there are those who go in and sell their labour to make a living. "Middle class" is a term invented to sow division in the second group.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm on my thirties, I don't know a single person that can afford to live alone, they are either sharing with a stranger/spouse or still with their parents.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 days ago

The governments solution will be to start offering 40 year mortgages. Do nothing to make housing affordable, just extend the time to pay it off like they've done with auto loans going from 60 months to 72 months terms.

load more comments
view more: next ›