this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59566 readers
4758 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Surprised pikachu face

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago
[–] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

This is what Ilya saw...

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

So what exactly is open about their ai

[–] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It’s called OpenAI because they are open to stealing content to train their AI

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Can't argue with objective truth

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You made this?

...I made this!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] abobla@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

"Don't tell me what to do, bro!"

[–] NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Open(your fucking wallet)AI

[–] Jocker@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

It's criminal they're keeping the name OpenAI

They put open in their name to get good talent, investments and so people would have a soft spot for them when they collect tons of data to build their product.

Their internal chats that were released in musk lawsuit reveals they knew they were gonna switch to for profit model (they here means the top brass). But they still lied to everybody about their intentions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Them investors got to get paid!

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Much open, very organic, very demure, so mindful.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

Shocked Cleesachu

[–] Harvey656@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My favorite part of this image is the image corruption on the bottom lol. Hopefully that wasn't a local my side issue or I'm gonna look insane

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

Somewhere along the way my copy got janked. I liked it so I keep using it.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'm partial to:

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

How exactly does one “outgrow” “AGI for the benefit of all humanity?

OpenAI Charter https://openai.com/charter

Our primary fiduciary duty is to humanity. We anticipate needing to marshal substantial resources to fulfill our mission, but will always diligently act to minimize conflicts of interest among our employees and stakeholders that could compromise broad benefit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I hope OpenAI is going to serve as a radicalising example to all the engineers, who fell for the "ethical guy/company" rhetoric, that the minority-controlled corporate structures they're used to cannot withstand the push for profit. I hope this will make more of them choose majority-controlled structures for their startups and demand unions in existing corpos.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, I was already radicalized in that respect, but it’s definitely reaffirming that radicalization.

But also: I fuckin told you so. This progression was so blindingly obvious from the get-go.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

OpenAI on that enshittification speedrun any% no-glitch!

Honestly though, they're skipping right past the "be good to users to get them to lock in" step. They can't even use the platform capitalism playbook because it costs too much to run AI platforms. Shit is egregiously expensive and doesn't deliver sufficient return to justify the cost. At this point I'm ~80% certain that AI is going to be a dead tech fad by the end of this decade because the economics just don't work now that the free money era has ended.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It will fall through much faster than that. I'm thinking two years, tops.

[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If your username is any prediction then it will be consumed by Lemmy... 🎶downtown🎶

[–] bzarb8ni@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Almost like Sam Altman is just another run of the mill tech bro scam guy.

I don't think he is a "tech bro scam guy", i think he is worse like he is smart and has a documented track record of lying. Unlike other tech bros, he actually knows the capability /limits of his products and he still lies and makes it out to be something it's not.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

reminder, there are localy ran LLMs. Right now is a vital time for open source to fight against closed source in the AI arms race.

https://www.nomic.ai/gpt4all

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Another good resource to help people find models https://llm.extractum.io

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I like Ollama, and recommend it to tinker, but I admit this "LLM Explorer" is quite neat thanks to sections like "LLMs Fit 16GB VRAM"

Ollama just works but it doesn't help to pick which model best fits your needs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (15 children)

Okay but what problem does that solve? Is the solution setting up our own spambots to fill forums with arguments counter to their bullshit spambots? I don't see how an LLM improves literally anything ever in any circumstance.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You seem unnecessarily hostile about this. If you don't like LLM just move on.

This is exactly why this sub about technology is better off without business news. You're just reacting to something you hate and directing that at others.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

But answer the question maybe

Also, my "hate" was very clearly directed towards LLMs and not a "person".

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

FWIW I did try a lot (LLMs, code, generative AI for images, 3D models) in a lot of ways (CLI, Web based, chat bot) both locally and using APIs.

I don't use any on a daily basis. I find it exciting that we can theoretically do a lot "more" automatically but... so far the results have not been worth the efforts. Sadly some of the best use cases are exactly what you highlighted, i.e low effort engagement for spam. Overall I find that either working with a professional (script writer, 3D modeler, dev, designer, etc) is a lot more rewarding but also more efficient which itself makes it cheaper.

For use cases where customization helps while quality does matter much due to scale, i.e spam, then LLMs and related tools are amazing.

PS: I'd love to hear the opinion of a spammer actually, maybe they also think it's not that efficient either.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] T156@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At the same time, the trouble with local LLMs is that they're very resource heavy. Your average household computer isn't going to be able to run one with much usability or speed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The fact that Silicon Valley interests effortlessly shrugged off the non-profit board's attempt to hit the kill switch last year, and now are preparing to take the company commercial despite the deliberate design otherwise, becomes much more interesting when you consider the theory that corporations are a form of artificial superintelligence.

If the AI idealists can't stand up to basic forces of capitalism, how do they expect to control an actually dangerous AGI?

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You give them far too much credit to assume this specific company will ever achieve anything even close to AGI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If the AI idealists can't stand up to basic forces of capitalism, how do they expect to control an actually dangerous AGI?

My guess is they don't expect to. I guess that that is one of the reasons they seem to not care about out of control climate change; burn it all down before it all literally burns down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

As Ed said, Sam Altman has been a plague.

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Probably has to be renamed to "ClosedAI" then.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Hey, remember when you guys lined up to suck his dick when the board tried to keep OpenAI working for the good of humanity instead of the oligarchy?

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I hate being right

Why do people keep being fooled by rich assholes

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

The article could be from 2022 and I'd be as unsurprised as I am now.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Step 1. Make an AI that hoovers up content.

Step 2. When owners of content complain about privacy violations and copyright infringement, allay their fears. This AI is for the Good of Humanity.

Step 3. ???

Step 4. Profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Surely they will be sued into oblivion if they tried right? Them being non profit was the main pillar holding up their defense for scraping the web into datasets.

load more comments
view more: next ›