this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

58480 readers
6028 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

The stranded peeps on the ISS must feel really good about their situation now.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wonder how much toxic waste that rocket dumped everywhere.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Not as much as you might think. Space launch rockets don't carry a lot of extra fuel beyond what's absolutely needed. Even propulsively landed rockets are almost empty.

If you want to be outraged, look at how much carbon dioxide is produced during ascent.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

Significantly less than the extremely toxic, hypergolic fueled boosters China drops on their villages.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty much just kerosene. So not the best, but not horrible. It just uses LOX and RP-1 (highly refined kerosene) for fuel.

What I get for saying something without googling first. I was expecting the hypergolic fueled mess of older rockets, but this is just a mess, but like, not THAT bad of a mess.

It's me, I'm the boomer.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most rockets crash into the ocean with all their contents on purpose. This one flew 23 times before finally shitting the bed on this landing.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's impressive, I do wonder if they have some estimated lifespan for each rocket or how many times it's reusable. Unless they intend to just keep using it with minimal to no maintenance at all. Which I guess would eventually lead to this.

[–] lefty7283@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Iirc the original goal was ‘at least 10’ but maybe up to 100 flights for a booster. No way to really know without flying them a lot

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yea the previous goal was 10 flights, now the goal is send it until something breaks.

Big advantage of having a built in customer (starlink)

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

Plus it did land on the barge. Most of the debris should be there, though the remaining fuel would have mainly gone overboard. Probably the flight termination explosives also.

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

The title makes it sound like the FAA told SpaceX to go to their room, for being very naughty.

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Musk taking Ls left and right

[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 1 month ago

Can you explain how a booster that flew 23 times is a loss when no other companies are doing it? I don't like Musk but people need to separate their views of him from SpaceX

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

The rocket blasted off from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station and got all 21 Starlink internet satellites to orbit. But the first-stage booster fell over in a fireball moments after landing on an ocean platform, the first such accident in years. It was the 23rd time this particular booster had launched, a recycling record for SpaceX.

Shit happens.

[–] InvertedParallax@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

Considering I was unmanned, and there wasn't really any damage that seems extreme.

I mean this is the same guy whos been selling self-driving cars for the last decade that constantly warn you to never let them self-drive.