this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

58513 readers
5760 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Wonder how much toxic waste that rocket dumped everywhere.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Not as much as you might think. Space launch rockets don't carry a lot of extra fuel beyond what's absolutely needed. Even propulsively landed rockets are almost empty.

If you want to be outraged, look at how much carbon dioxide is produced during ascent.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 month ago

Significantly less than the extremely toxic, hypergolic fueled boosters China drops on their villages.

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty much just kerosene. So not the best, but not horrible. It just uses LOX and RP-1 (highly refined kerosene) for fuel.

What I get for saying something without googling first. I was expecting the hypergolic fueled mess of older rockets, but this is just a mess, but like, not THAT bad of a mess.

It's me, I'm the boomer.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Most rockets crash into the ocean with all their contents on purpose. This one flew 23 times before finally shitting the bed on this landing.

[–] Morphit@feddit.uk 0 points 1 month ago

Plus it did land on the barge. Most of the debris should be there, though the remaining fuel would have mainly gone overboard. Probably the flight termination explosives also.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's impressive, I do wonder if they have some estimated lifespan for each rocket or how many times it's reusable. Unless they intend to just keep using it with minimal to no maintenance at all. Which I guess would eventually lead to this.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yea the previous goal was 10 flights, now the goal is send it until something breaks.

Big advantage of having a built in customer (starlink)

[–] lefty7283@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Iirc the original goal was ‘at least 10’ but maybe up to 100 flights for a booster. No way to really know without flying them a lot