this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
264 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54121 readers
444 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 89 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This ‘secrecy’ is not an oversight but a feature that’s codified in the agreement between rightsholders and Internet providers.

Well this setup seems perfectly secure and not at all susceptible to malicious actors.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 22 points 1 month ago

Secrecy and bypassing court orders? It seems like illegal censorship to me.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 63 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Disappointing, Germany. How can we trust you to find the best pirate sites when not even thepiratebay.org is on the list?

[–] suzune@ani.social 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They don't block torrents because they like to watch people connect to the nodes and then sue them.

It's always better to use onion routing.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 113 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, stick to VPNs. Don't overload Tor with pirate media. Tor network isn't meant for large data transfers like that.

[–] Staubsaugernasenmann@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I2P could be a suitable alternative for this. Although it is rather slow it still works and you dont have to worry about beeing exposed

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Pretty much like the original reason why napster has been created. It could resume downloads which in the times of early internet explorer wasn't that guaranteed

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ones that monitor torrent to sue people are lawyer firms, not the government.

[–] Txmyx@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

The government is also not blocking any sites. Only like 5 ISPs are in the CUII. Many people are not even affected

[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago

After a quick butchers at the list, I think they are going after streaming sites rather than torrent sites per se.

[–] average_joe@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 month ago

I think the list mostly contains german piracy websites like kino is german for cinema

[–] EddyBot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago

usage of public torrent tracker in germany is almost non-existent
the fear of getting sued by copyright laywers is pretty high

[–] average_joe@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How do they even block it? Dns filter or they also block the hosting server?

[–] Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 1 month ago

its just missing dns entrys.

if you configure anything other than your providers default dns server you don't notice it.

[–] junusdenised420@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just dns blocks, s.to for example has a site dedicated to lising all domains of theirs and ways to change your dns server which isnt blocked afaik. serien.domains if you wanna check it out

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Italy also has DNS filtering, but they recently added IP blocking for some sports streaming websites. This had terrible consequences

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

This had terrible consequences

Ha, they never learn. They also blocked most of Cloudflare in Austria a few years back.

Fun fact: It was the first IP block they tried. They haven't tried again since then.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/consequences-of-ip-blocking/

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

🤣 Boomers at PC = a mess

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So these are blocked on a DNS Level? So just using a different DNS (like 9.9.9.9 or 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8) will get around this „block“

[–] Tja@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago

From the article

To address the alleged censorship part, the site also links to various options available to the public to circumvent the blocking efforts. This includes switching to third party DNS resolvers.

[–] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

👏👏👏

[–] GatoEscobar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

The webaite is well designed for a 17 year old, or at least for someone to at least attempt the cause.

https://cuiiliste.de/