this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2024

18 points (65.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7227 readers

155 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

pangyuehung@lemmy.ml

yogthos@lemmy.ml

Democrats’ party platform doesn’t call for arms embargo on Israel (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/18811470

The 92-page document will be voted on by delegates Monday evening.

Paywall removed https://archive.is/irAkp

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] giacomo@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i mean, thats not surprising. both us parties support Israel no matter what.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What on earth is the political advantage ?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago

An unsinkable aircraft carrier in the middle east to further the US' imperial ambitions

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I asked myself the same thing. Lots of layers to that. A foothold in the middle east is among them. A lot more surprising are the radical Christians that somehow like the radical Jews. Also selling guns, and a few more cultural things too.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I feel like there's something bigger we're missing. Both parties seem willing to gamble on losing the election over support for Israel, even now.

[–] featured@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 3 months ago

Genocidal fascists

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

And I hate them for that... but funny enough I hate them less than the other idiots who want to dismantle my livelihood

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What would it take for you to reject both?

[–] gramathy@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago (40 children)

Much like everyone else who shares that opinion, a viable third option that doesn’t throw the election to the right wing when you vote for it

load more comments (40 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Of course not. That's way too fine to tightrope for them to walk for it to be summed up in a platform at the convention. I hate that it's that way, but it's a damned if you do damned if you don't situation for them. Therefore it's an entirely numbers-based strategy, no matter what the actual may believe.

[–] unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Crazy. This was voted on by the delegates?

Are these the very same delegates who received their mandate as a result of the primary process in which Muslim voters overwhelmingly refused to submit even a single vote?

It's almost as if you're suggesting that refusing to participate in the democratic process means that your ideas will largely be discounted, as you bring literally nothing to the table in terms of political capital, but that just doesn't seem quite right?

Look, I'm 100% for peace in Gaza & on earth more broadly, but you can't refuse to return your RSVP and then act shocked that the host didn't save you a place at the table.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (34 children)

Neither does Republican, right?

[–] Zanudous@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Didn't Trump say that Israel should just "finish the job"?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (7 children)

What job is there to finish? Biden already flattened Gaza.

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I believe so, yes.

load more comments (33 replies)

load more comments