this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39151 readers
2430 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
lemmyAtom@lemmy.world
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world
3
‘It made me cry’: photos taken 15 years apart show melting Swiss glaciers (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 months ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A tourist has posted “staggering” photos of himself and his wife at the same spot in the Swiss Alps almost exactly 15 years apart, in a pair of photos that highlight the speed with which global heating is melting glaciers.

Duncan Porter, a software developer from Bristol, posted photos that were taken in the same spot at the Rhone glacier in August 2009 and August 2024. The white ice that filled the background has shrunk to reveal grey rock. A once-small pool at the bottom, out of sight in the original, has turned into a vast green lake.

“Not gonna lie, it made me cry,” Porter said in a viral post on social media platform X on Sunday night.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Transporter_Room_3@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

My dad thinks climate change is a scam and "someone [i]s making a lot of money from it"

My dad also laments that the local lake doesn't freeze over like it did when he was a teenager, DRIVING on top of it with his brothers.

Totally unrelated to climate change though. Cause that's totes fake.

Also storms are more violent and frequent, winters are basically spring 2.0 now and the local river has flooded way past historic levels and could threaten the downtown area of their city within the decade.

But all that is SOOOOOOO unrelated.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The cognitive dissonance is so strange to me. I'm a native Cheesehead and it's a well documented fact that ice fishing season in Wisconsin is quickly getting shorter and shorter due to the higher winter temperatures.

Maybe it's a branding issue. What if we start referring to "climate change" as "demise of ice fishing" or "imminent collapse of the snowmobile industry"?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

imminent collapse of the snow industry

That should make the tourism industry get their lobbying straight.

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He is partially right - there are people making a lot of money from climate change... Or at least from causing it

[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 1 points 3 months ago

That’s capitalism for you: one company makes money creating the problem and another fixing it! It’s double-pumped!

[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be fair there are also a lot of 'green' company scams out there too. Grifters are everywhere

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Yup, and it has a name - Greenwashing.

[–] Tugboater203@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A thousand year event, every year.

[–] andrewth09@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The hottest day on record every year

[–] Imperor@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Don't worry. Some people I know can still go skiing, so clearly it's all fake and a non-issue.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

"It won't happen in our lifetimes"

guess what mfers

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Everyone in this sub agrees that climate change is a disastrous event, and that we're not doing enough. But as soon as you suggest changing to a system that actually may do something against it, you guys drop the t-word like there's no tomorrow.

Edit: to all of you fellas downvoting me, I have a message. Don't worry, we will surely defeat climate change by reforming capitalism against the interests of those controlling the media and our politicians through their vast wealth, as we've been achieving for the past 20 years in which the CO2 emissions have been reducing exponentially!

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

While capitalism is a big accelerator of climate change, socialism could do the same. Whether you exploit the environment for capitalist profit or the perceived profit of human society, the end result can be the same.

All animals want to exploit nature for their benefit, even if it is a short term benefit but a long term loss. Humans, and arguebly capitalism, are just more efficient. But here is an infamous example of socialism fucking the environment

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aral_Sea

PS People's issue isnt with socialism, it's with supporting authoritative regimes, that dont even claim to be socialist(Russia for example)

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While capitalism is a big accelerator of climate change, socialism could do the same

The difference is that capitalism by its nature requires the degradation of the environment. Capitalism, by definition, needs to increase profits year after year. Unlimited growth is impossible in a finite planet with limited technology without degrading the environment, so capitalism simply ignores the climate in its quest for higher profits. After all, you can't risk getting outcompeted by another company which will be less afraid of abusing nature.

Socialism, on the other hand, doesn't need perpetual growth. The objective isn't infinite profit, the objective is higher living quality for people, which doesn't necessarily rely on increased material wealth, especially not in a context of degrading climate which negatively affects the quality of life of people. It doesn't mean socialism doesn't have to work hard to prevent degrading nature, it just means that it's not a necessary logical consequence of socialism whereas it is of capitalism.

You talk about historical proof. The reality is that historically, the groups concerned by climate change have consistently been to the left of the political spectrum, whereas the right wing (capitalism's most loyal defenders) doesn't seem to care. For 36 years we've had an International Panel on Climate Change (though ExxonMobil had reports of Climate Change being manmade since the early 70s and hid them), and for 36 years scientists have been saying the same: we're not doing enough. What's been the response of capitalist governments everywhere? "We shall continue not doing enough". How many years of capitalism in all countries failing to step up to the problem do you need to realize that capitalism simply has no incentives to solve this problem because it's fundamentally an antidemocratic system, in which the interests of a few in the owning class are held above those of the working class?

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You could argue that what we have isnt true capitalism, since our current system doesnt include the environmental cost. If we could do that, then the cost of doing things would greatly increase, thus forcing capitalism to be more environmentally friendly.

I dont want to defend capitalism, but there is a potential version of capitalism that could work. Kinda how we use the replicative aggressive function of viruses for healing.

The fact that in the West, right wings are often insane, doesnt mean much. 95% of new coal power plants are built in China. Are they right wing? I think they are but tankies think China is socialist.

Obviously China has immense demand for power and it is in many ways a developing country. They took some measures to reduce the negative environmental effect. Their cities were covered in smog till recently, they had to do something.

But despite that, they still value the growth/wealth of cheap electric power.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

You could argue that what we have isnt true capitalism

No, I couldn't. Capitalism doesn't need to account for every externality to be capitalism.

If we could do that

We've been trying for 36 years with no result. That's exactly my point. The people who benefit from the lack of account of externalities are the ones in control of the system.

but there is a potential version of capitalism that could work

That version of capitalism is "let's make the public opinion guided by the scientific research make the environmental decisions". At that point, why stop with accounting for externalities and planning the economy as a whole in a democratic fashion? Why this obsession with maintaining capitalism?

Obviously China has immense demand for power and it is in many ways a developing country

You got it. You can't expect a developing county to rely on new and expensive tech instead of cheap and reliable one during the process of industrialization. But currently, China is by far the country installing most renewables. I personally don't consider China to be very socialist, but saying they're right wing is far from the truth as well.

The problem with capitalism as well, is the competition not only between companies, but between geopolitical blocks. You can't expect China or the US to degrow when they're geopolitical enemies that are in theory threated by each other. In reality, the US is the main threatener, followed by Russia, since they're both heavily capitalist and imperialist countries with opposing interests and different capitalists who fight each other for supremacy. Unless we eliminate these capitalist threats of geopolitical fights by transcending to worldwide socialism, degrowth simply will not occur, and climate deals that harm the economy of countries won't be agreed on.

[–] ChadCMulligan@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What’s the T word?

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago

Starts with "t", rhymes with the Sumerian god of water and patron God of the city of Eridu "Enki".

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

What's the t-word?

Is it titties? It's titties, isn't it?

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wish it was tiddies, m8

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I genuinely don't know what the t-word is, though. I'm not feeling extra smart right now. Please feel free to help me out here.

[–] volodya_ilich@lemm.ee -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I explained in a funny way to another fella: it starts with "t", and rhymes with the Sumerian god of water and patron of the city or Eridu, "Enki".

[–] remer@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is clearly a catastrophic amount of melting but the perspective, both angle and zoom, exaggerate the melting here. The older photo is more zoomed in and has the mountains higher in the frame. That gives the anti-environmental people something to work with to attempt to discredit the melting.

[–] Tiresia@slrpnk.net -1 points 3 months ago

I put together this gif for a side-by-side comparison. The picture was taken from a slightly different location, so it's not perfect, but the difference is obvious.

[–] LibreHans@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The earth changes?! How dare it!?

[–] nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

Yawn. Same old talking points.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I doubt anyone here actually needs to hear it, but just in case: the problem is that we're changing it, and we're changing it for the worse

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Also, we're changing it far too quickly for everything else to keep up.