this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
18 points (87.5% liked)

News

23035 readers
3127 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Biden realized that Netanyahu was lying to him about the hostages," the official told Haaretz. "He's not saying it publicly yet, but in the meeting between them, he specifically told him, 'Stop bullshitting me.'"

On Friday, a senior member of the Israeli negotiating team told Haaretz that Israeli defense chiefs believe Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not interested in a hostage deal/cease-fire with Hamas. Israel's Channel 12 also reported on a tense exchange between Netanyahu and the defense chiefs, in which Shin Bet head Ronen Bar said, "It feels like the prime minister doesn't want the framework that's on the table." Turning to Netanyahu, he added that if that is the case, "you should tell us."

Mossad chief David Barnea stressed to Netanyahu, "There is a deal on the table. If we delay, we could miss the opportunity. We have to take it." Netanyahu, per the report, reacted angrily, accusing the defense chiefs of being "soft."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Another pictorial example of Bibi shitting hits pants on purpose.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (12 children)

So sick of my tax dollars going to these ungrateful fucks who dishonor their ancestors by partaking in exactly what they themselves went through.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

So he should pull support from him

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We should back away from Israel. We have absolutely no legitimate business with them and they bring nothing to the table.

Israel offers no unique military logistics, as we already have full access to the region via neighboring installations. They offer no substantial business to the U.S. They bring only strained relations with neighboring countries, with whom we have much more lucrative business ties.

It's time to back away from this toxic, one-sided relationship. It's time for Israel to be diplomatic with their neighbors instead of starting wars they want the U.S. to win for them.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

But if something were to happen to Israel, the death cult can't continue to try to kickstart the rapture so we can go to the mcdonald's playplace in the sky.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 1 month ago

They offer no substantial business to the U.S.

Israel does offer substantial business to the US and that is surveillance technology.

From Surveillance Policies, Practices and Technologies in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories: Assessing the Security State

A discussion of surveillance within Israel would be incomplete without a confrontation with political economy and the development of security technologies. Neve Gordon (2009) argues that the ‘Israeli experience’, in its various manifestations, has played a pivotal role in the formation of Israel’s homeland security industry and its subsequent transformation into a global success story. The innovations in security and military technologies developed in Israeli laboratories have also facilitated the increased ‘virtual occupation’ of Gaza since the ‘Disengagement Plan’ (Sperotto 2010). Israel’s ‘separation barrier’, widely cited as a violation of Palestinian human rights, is premised on an array of sniper towers, electric fences, trenches, cameras, sensors, patrol roads, ditches, and military patrols (International Court of Justice 2004; B’Tselem 2006; International Federation for Human Rights 2004) – a blend of technological devises and various surveillance techniques developed in Israel.

What these political-economic perspectives on surveillance offer is a ‘made in Israel’ approach to the development of security strategies and methodologies, as well as the construction of a surveillance apparatus that is deployed in Israel, the OPT, and abroad by purchasers of this know-how. The IDF’s recent upgrades to the Gaza fence is noteworthy, considering the interface between the military through the newly-upgraded Combat Collection Corps, the network of intelligence agents working within Gaza, surveillance technologies, and national security policies determined to enforce iron clad borders (Katz 2010). This provides a testing ground of sorts for military strategy, technology, and border policies that could effectively be adapted for use outside of Israel. In 2006, Elbit Systems was awarded a contract, along with Boeing, to build the security wall on the U.S.-Mexican border (World War 4 Report 2006). Because of the international public acclaim that accompanies Israel’s defence industry, Israeli-based firms, as well as foreign companies that contribute to the country’s security apparatus, such as Motorola, Elbit, Boeing and others, have become targets of the transnational boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaign (Macdonald 2010; New York Campaign for the Boycott of Israel n.d.; The Council on Ethics 2009; Cattatori 2009; Campaign Against U.S. Terror Weapons n.d.), which constitute the central internationalist non-violent movement against Israel’s illegal military occupation of Palestinian territory and continuous defiance of international law (see Bakan and Abu-Laban 2009).

Israel tests it's surveillance technology on Palestine, then exports that technology to other countries.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now that's a meme I've not seen in a long time. A long time.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Really, Biden just noticed the lying? No way the president is that obtuse.

[–] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Could also use this pokemon meme

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

You mean the Netanyahu whom Sarkozy and Obama called a liar 10 years ago? I mean, come on, obviously anyone with close knowledge of Israel ans Palestine knows Bibis track record – but if Obama knew it 10 years ago, then even his then-VP maybe should have known it too ????

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

i hope he has his aides ready to tell him "duh doy" on this realization.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let Iran bomb the shit out of them a few days before calling for a cease fire.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

And then claim the ceasefire deal is terrible even though it gets you exactly what you claim to want.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Gee, what could have possibly clued Biden into the fact that Netenyahu was being disingenuous? Could it possibly have been the fact that after every time they spoke, Bibi would immediately go on-air in Israeli press and brag about what a little removed Biden is and how he’s completely in Bibi’s pocket? Could that have been a sign?!

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

the united states will continue to fellate israel until the end of time, regardless of who's POTUS. and israel knows that to be the case, regardless of who's leading israel. the intelligence alone is something the US will never give up. in addition to being really the US's only reliable tentacle in the middle east

[–] Cuttlefish1111@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I doubt it. Their spy tools have been sold. They won’t be helpful for long. As generations die no one cares. They basically maintain our nukes.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Over the course of the Genocide the notion that we really want israel to exist as a strategic ally has started to look extremely wonky to me.

Looking at previous history as well, I have concluded the "strategic partner" narrative is purely an excuse for israeli lobbyists. Such as the best funded lobbyist for israel

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is absolutely a factor, but there are also absolutely people who view this as an important part of American power projection. While I don't think that supporting Israel has been making the US stronger in this era, it has historically been a key strategic location due to how close it is to the suez and global oil trade.

It is darkly funny how cheaply American politicians can be bought, meanwhile we shovel endless piles of money to Israel, which it then uses to shore up political support for continuing to send them money and ammunition.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Egypt controls Suez though. We just overthrew their government and installed Sisi as a dictator to control it. Israel had little to do with that. Same with Iraq. We use Saudi Arabia as a base.

Israel as a strategic partner is a great excuse on the surface because really blurs the line of the true motive. But in reality we now see America supporting israeli actions which are contradictory to our interests in the region (unless we really want WW3). Having a strategic partner requires that partner to obey you, not the other way around

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not gonna start debating you on this, I was referring to the historical reason for the occupation of Palestine, quoting Churchill:

I say that Palestine is all the more important to us in view of what is happening, in view of the ever-growing significance to the British Empire of the Suez Canal; and I do not think £1,000,000 a year [...] would be too much for Great Britain to pay for the control and guardianship of this great historic land

There was no AIPAC then, unless you're suggesting that there was some other lobbying at play.

US strategic planners wanted Israel because it's an unsinkable aircraft carrier parked right next to the Suez (among other things). That doesn't mean that it's actually useful at the end of the day, but that's absolutely the stated logic behind things.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I certainly don’t disagree that it is an advantageous piece of land. Which is why it was one of the best OG Hasbara points.

The problem is that we already control Egypt and have military bases over the entire region. Israel wants to be autonomous. We can give israel weapons but we are not allowed to control what they will do with said weapons. Whereas with other countries we just topple their regime if they don’t listen.

Then there’s Incidents such as the USS liberty. Israel tries to make America go to war with Egypt by committing a false flag attack on an American ship and blaming it on Egypt Or how israel is currently desperately trying to pull us into a war with Iran. This is not how a having an ally in the region works.

There is no denying that Palestine has great placement geographically but the amount of flak we are currently taking because israel acts like a rabid attack dog while we still provide them weapons “against our will” goes directly against israel being a strategic ally. This only leaves israeli lobbies such as AIPAC controlling our politicians as a real explanation of israel still receiving weapons.

Unless we're trying to evoke a war with Iran ourselves, but I don't see that as a possibility.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is no denying that Palestine has great placement geographically but the amount of flak we are currently taking because israel acts like a rabid attack dog while we still provide them weapons “against our will” goes directly against israel being a strategic ally.

The 'lot of flak' the US is getting is hurting them a lot less than more concrete things like the trade disruptions due to the red sea shipping attacks. The occupation failing to keep a lid on things has absolutely put its immediate strategic value into question, that has not always been the case.

This only leaves israeli lobbies such as AIPAC controlling our politicians as a real explanation of israel still receiving weapons.

I am aware that the US government is completely beholden to financial influence, however I don't care for the narrative being 'the real explanation is that israel is controlling our politicians' that's really the reductive angle. You can point to the numbers of donations to politicians, but there's also a tremendous power wielded by the military industries. They are often the sole or anchor employers in cities across the country and any cut to buying weapons gets framed as cutting jobs for everyday Joes. Those weapons then get gifted to people who use them on civilians.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The ‘lot of flak’ the US is getting is hurting them a lot less than more concrete things like the trade disruptions due to the red sea shipping attacks.

Which also is caused by America not forcing israel to stop their Genocide for some reason...

Of course politicians aren't solely beholden to israel. There are plenty of other lobby organizations which get what they want because they bribe politicians. Oil lobbies, Agro lobbies, Pharma lobbies etc. Military Industrial lobby of course loves what israel is doing right now.

It's just that when it comes to israel, the politicians act the way israel wants instead of in a strategically advantageous way for America. There's not much of a case that can be made for the current government actions other than "Our politicians are bribed by israel"

Past israel did a far better job appealing to politicians to make a case for their existence than current israel though I'll agree with that. Hasbro game is weak these days.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which also is caused by America not forcing israel to stop their Genocide for some reason…

For some Americans, the perception that they're a settler state fighting off the brown horde is reason enough for common cause.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And ironically much of the the anti-Arab propaganda also has its roots in israel. (and this article for a deeper dive)

But of course racism is not really a realpolitik objective.

[–] ProvableGecko@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well the US have been busy inventing a back up for decades now.

Who else in the middle east has a sizable population that spans many countries which, in the case of independence, would conveniently destabilize the middle east yet wholely depend on the US for survival, as it would be completely surrounded by sworn enemies, therefore would have to act as a defacto US state in foreign affairs?

Anyway, we are halfway there now and the rest shouldn't take too long

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I don't really follow what you're trying to say. I'm not sure there is a viable backup to Israel as a client state in the region.

[–] SoJB@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

You’ll see liberals and fascists do this often, they try to play the same “leading question” game leftists use but it just falls completely flat since their deranged worldview instantly falls apart under any scrutiny.

Like, literally what are they even talking about? It makes no sense lmfao.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I'd argue Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Jordan are far easier and more controllable outposts right now.

An "ally" that doesn't listen and engulfs the region in chaos only seems counterproductive. Reliable is the last word I'd attribute to israel.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not use Netanyahu as a hostage?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

"All you middle-east countries need to work together peacefully, or I will release Netanyahu unharmed."

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Any bets on whether this will change anything? I mean yeah, it doesn't seem likely and the prevailing opinion seems to be "fuck no", but I have no idea how informed that opinion is.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This specifically? Probably not just because Biden only has a few months left. But I think we're going to see a generational change in attitude from future presidents. Israel better get their shit together before that happens.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what is Harris' stance on Israel? I'm from YUROP and I don't actually know very much about her policy positions

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

So far pretty lockstep with Biden. No concrete signs of improvement yet just some lip service.

Her track record is pretty bad as well she fought for illegal israeli settlements.

Soon after being elected to the Senate in 2016, Harris earned a reputation as an ardent defender of Israel. She spoke two years in a row at AIPAC conferences and co-sponsored legislation aimed at undermining a United Nations resolution condemning Israel’s illegal annexation of Palestinian land. One of her first international trips as a senator was to Israel where she met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2017. “I support the United States’ commitment to provide Israel with $38 billion in military assistance over the next decade,” Harris told an AIPAC conference that year. “I believe the bonds between the United States and Israel are unbreakable, and we can never let anyone drive a wedge between us. … As long as I’m a United States senator, I will do everything in my power to ensure broad and bipartisan support for Israel’s security and right to self-defense.”

load more comments
view more: next ›