this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toes@ani.social 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

But someone else leveraged their assets to create synergy. So they can be proud of that, at least.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's Yahoo! all over again, but even less relevant.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

I dunno that's kind of an insult to Yahoo! At least it's fun to say.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

Only because Yahoo! isn’t very relevant now, but it was when it happened to them, and due to the similarities, it kinda makes the relevant at the moment.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I would like to see more articles about technology, and fewer about corporate valuations.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You and me both. Seems like we're in the minority, though. If I wanted business news, I'd be on a business community.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Come to think of it, this article isn't about technology, or even about a company that produces technology. It's about the purchase of a company that once upon a time used to write stories about other companies that might or might not have done something notable with technology.

It doesn't get much more off-topic than this. I'm reporting it.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 0 points 3 months ago

Report these articles with "Business news, not tech news", and there's a high chance it'll be removed.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

After being purchased by private equity backed marketing firm Red Ventures in 2020, the company has been in a downward....

Red Ventures?

I know someone who works (or at least worked) there. Despite them telling me more than once what RV does, I still have no idea what Red Ventures does.

[–] DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

My guess: turn failing big companies into failing little ones.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 months ago

Strip them for parts (which is to say extract all the value in the form of golden parachutes)

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

A private equity firms purchase usually means they'll strip the company and its customers/users of as much value as possible, then sell whatever scraps (brand) is left over.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago

From wiki

Red Ventures is an American media company that owns and operates brands such as Lonely Planet, CNET, ZDNet, The Points Guy, Healthline, and Bankrate.[1] Red Ventures focuses on news, advice, and review websites.[2]

Seems pretty straightforward.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I realize the article was written to make it sound like they lost money on this, but I would be shocked if they had.

To vastly oversimplify it, private equity does a few things to make money on the companies they acquire:

  • Significantly reduce staff, and increasing workload
  • Strip and sell off individual assets
  • Load the company with debt

The last parts are where it goes from amoral to "HOW THE FUCK IS THAT LEGAL?"

The private equity firm will have its own separate entities that provide a variety of services, for example janitorial or administrative.

The new private equity owners will then replace all the current vendors, with their own entities at a expentionally hirer costs. All the while, paying themselves gigantic consulting fees.

Basically those are all just ways to legally embezzle money by extracting all the resources from the company. Once that's done, they'll sell the last thing of value: the brand name itself e.g. CNET, VICE, etc.

If there is no money in the brand and self, then they'll just dissolve the company.

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's tragic when a company loses so much value due to losing sight of the next big hype train. I'm sure they tried to pivot from blockchain into AI, but didn't quite make the leap in time to save themselves. (Sarcasm)

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

What about... hear me out here... AI-chain. I think this has legs!

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 0 points 3 months ago

"Private Equity" says it all.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago

They jumped the shark when Buzz Out Loud ended.

[–] finley@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It basically got bought by Ziff Davis, which is ironic because, years ago, ZDnet (run by Davis) was run out of business by CNET.

Cute

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 3 months ago

I hope this is at least the beginning of the turning point for companies' mad dash to total enshittification. It can be, if we, on massive, global levels, simply stop accepting it.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

TUAW (The Unofficial Apple Weblog), once a long-standing trusted source for Apple news, recently became an AI clickbait farm owned by an equity firm. The pictures of the columnists that used to work there are now being posted on fake articles against fake names.

Now all CNET links are suspect for the same reason.

Slowly but surely the web I grew up with is becoming zombified garbage.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 0 points 3 months ago

The AI system was always faster than human writers at generating stories, the company found, but editing its work took much longer than editing a real staffer’s copy. The tool also had a tendency to write sentences that sounded plausible but were incorrect, and it was known to plagiarize language from the sources it was trained on.

I love hearing about AI biting companies in the ass. The more spectacular failures we have, the sooner people will shut up about it.

[–] BlackJerseyGiant@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 3 months ago

Enshittification continues its boring dystopian sprawl...