this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58424 readers
4670 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

The power of 21000 homes for advertising.

What's most impressive is that it is even legal.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I love this kind of shit. Building things for the sake of it is worth it. Not only as just expression, which may be hubris but it's still expression. Also entertainment, inspiration, pushing the art of engineering, and just giving people something to do, and all the good that comes with that like personal and trade growth.

A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A purely utilitarian life is a life only spent on survival. Not a life I want to live.

Well, that hubris won't afford you a livable world for much longer.

We could have respected the planet that birthed us, and taken only what we needed. Instead we extracted every natural resource we could find, and left behind countless shattered ecosystems. Even as the walls close in, we accelerate our pettiness and perform acts of wastefulness that alone do measurable ecological damage, and we celebrate it because it is "cool".

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (147 children)

If this is something you feel strongly about, then please stop eating factory farmed meat and animal products if you havent already. It is something you personally can actually do. It helps, and it will genuinely make you feel better. You may not have much power, but using the power you do have to help the team you claim to be on instead of the other team is a massive step forward.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Look, you're not really wrong, but you get that this shit is why people get irritated with vegans right? We were talking about being wasteful with energy resources for the sake of capitalism and you came in with a lazy segue to animal rights and nutritional health.

It's a conversation that we should be having, but it's also insufferable to constantly be shoehorning it into every conversation.

[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (20 children)

I don't agree. The comment points out the single most easy and effektive move an individal without political nor financial power can make to cut personal co2-emissions with just a change of habit. It's not about animal rights and not about your health. Us still eating meat even though we know better is an incredibly dumb waste of energy for the sake of pleasure, exactly like this shitty powereating globe.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh, you're one of those "you can save the planet with your personal habits" people...

You enjoy your salad. I'm wondering what it takes to firebomb an oil refinery.

[–] AIhasUse@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And you are one of those "every problem on the planet is the fault of someone else other than me so I can do whatever I want with no regard for it's affect on anyone else" people. Stay away from us if you can't be bothered to carry your own weight, you just drag down people who actually give a shit about something other than their own immediate selfish gratification.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

You came in here with your absolutist utilitarian life above all else or we all die post just to respond with this because someone suggested you to stop eating meat. Beautiful.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (146 replies)
[–] rasensprenger@feddit.org 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand that perspective, but does it really have to be advertising?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

I'd prefer if it weren't. Though that's not the only use for this thing.

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We can do that, but first let’s make sure everyone on the planet has clean water first.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 0 points 2 months ago (9 children)

The money spent on this would not have been spent on giving clean water to people thousands of miles away

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Is that where guillotines come in?

[–] dandi8@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Does this really make it any less worthy of criticism, though...?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This isn't pushing any boundaries, though. This is off the shelf technology. Anybody can do something big by throwing a shit ton of money at it. It would be pushing boundaries of tech or art if it was for instance super power efficient, or mind bending in any way. This is a fucking sphere, it's the simplest shape and a rip off of the pyramids but less original and not even comparable in terms of durability.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Could it not be argued that building this thing now gives people a chance at looking at the power draw and attempting to make it super efficient? Like now people have a tool to test things on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] geography082@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Add a solar array and battery bank, a you might even have electricity left over. It’s in the desert after all.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Still a waste of energy because that could be used for the general grid

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t say entertainment is a waste of energy even if there are nobler uses for the power.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Advertising may be entertaining but it's not entertainment

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

…Las Vegas Sphere—a gigantic spherical entertainment arena sitting at the heart of Sin City…

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 months ago

I think he means the outside

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Here's a link. You can go inside of it and it's essentially a huge concert venue. It's clearly entertainment.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TuanMw6zwBk

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I dunno man. You ever see the infomercials for the magic bullet, or the slapchop?

Fetticini

Linguine

Martini

Bikini.

You're gonna love my nuts!

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remember when he got his dick almost bitten off while doing coke with a hooker?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago

It may be entertaining, but it's not entertainment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

There wouldn't be an incentive or the capital necessary to instigate the build out of solar without the sphere. Yes, it would be great if someone did that. But the owners of the sphere specifically have a financial incentive to do so for the sake of lower energy costs. There's not a lack of land or sun, so whether they do or do not doesn't amount to a "waste" of energy - anyone else can build out solar production too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 2 months ago

allow me to remind you about ✨opportunity costs ✨

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Have you ever seen a solar array that gives 28 MW?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] root@precious.net 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Using the max power use of a video card to math this is ridiculous. It's not at full TDP pushing this content. They aren't playing max FPS 3D raytraced gaming, they're playing videos.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

What.

The article says that, for the GPUs, they can have a "maximum power draw of 45,000 W at full tilt".

The 28 million W comes from the full system, and surely the massive displays, LEDs and eventually sound system makes up the bulk of that, the gfx cards are a rounding error...

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Currently, an agreement is under review to ensure that 70% of the Sphere's power needs will come from solar sources, with the other 30% from non-renewable energy that will be offset by renewable energy credits.

Ahh yes, energy credits. Aka bullshit.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Hey!

They’re not always BS. Just most of the time!

Or are they? Some of the companies who are the best at it and seem to be genuinely trying have been shown not to be able to guarantee one way or the other.

“Wait, someone cut down that forest we planted?!” (no joke)

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

At least I understand forests that are replanted over and over to be used for lumber, effectively reducing the use of old lumber for myriad products.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (12 children)

Wait, why do they need 150 GPUs for a 1.2 megapixel display?

That's less than 1080p!

Who engineered this monstrosity?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago

I hope the name “dystopia sphere” catches on.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Wouldn't just one GPU be enough to run the Sphere, or a I getting something wrong?

I remember hearing about that it's not exactly high resolution, each "pixel" being a bunch of pretty large lamps.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›