this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59587 readers
2940 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

sounds like EU really dodged that bullet. Good on them.

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Y'all just becoming luddites afraid of big scary tech. Oh no, the big bad siri 2 is going to hurt me!!!

[–] sunglocto@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why are you using Lemmy then? Go back to reddit if you aren't scared of them

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I didn’t realize Lemmy was so restrictive. 🙄

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

What are you going on about?

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Don't interact with these people. He's clearly a moron, purposefully using provocative slurs

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago

That’s what they said about bitcoin, and there’s still nothing useful at any kind of scale outside of scams.

[–] Sidyctism2@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Look into what the luddites actually where, instead of repeating propaganda

[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Lololol not sure what you even think it's going to change.

[–] OsaErisXero@kbin.run 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Can't imagine how this could be perceived as anything but retaliation for the EU daring to attempt to regulate Apple

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

That was my first thought.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nah, it makes sense. Apple really likes their proprietary walled garden, so the interoperability requirements trouble them deeply.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No.

Interoperability is only required, if you have a significant market share. Apple does not have this in the EU. iMessage specifically doesn't fall under this regulation, since hardly anyone uses it.

And since Apple plans to publish an SDK for their intelligence anyway, you can't really regulate them for being too closed.

So either that's a purely political retaliation, or their "super privacy friendly" services aren't as privacy friendly as they claim.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

or their "super privacy friendly" services aren't as privacy friendly as they claim.

I would bet real currency it's this one.

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Apple does have a significant market share of 25-30% in Europe. Just because they avoided having to open iMessage (for now) because everyone in Europe uses WhatsApp, doesn't mean other Apple services are safe from regulation.

But I'm with you - it's more likely about (not so) privacy.

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah exactly. Remember when they wanted to kill PWAs in Europe blaming the DMA? They had to revert course eventually due to backlash.

[–] Drusenija@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Oh, I missed them having to backpedal on that! That's good news.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It's very easy for them to twist the history. Losing PWA would have really sucked. I use those quite extensively, even if they aren't perfect

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Funny how companies believe they are punishing you by withholding AI crap nobody wants.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Data privacy AND not having to deal with more bullshit AI? Oh my, how will we ever cope with this... /s

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

wasn’t the main point of apples ai that it runs on device? asking explicitly every time it might need to send data anywhere else seems fine

[–] meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's apparently different tiers, where some stuff is done locally but anything slightly complex would require it go to apple's servers.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

yeah, i remember watching the announcement live, they said that in some cases it would prompt the user, like this

(photo taken from apples announcement blog post)

[–] meliaesc@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Read over it again, and there's 3 tiers. Local, apple cloud, and then chatgpt. It won't prompt for Apple cloud requests.

[–] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 0 points 5 months ago

thanks, i looked into apples cloud, they have this article https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/

it all seems okay from a technical perspective but you are right that it’s not good to have to trust apple here. i would love to see a setting to prompt the user for apples cloud, in the same way that it currently prompts for chatgpt.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Apple's may start being salty and blame everything on anti-trust from now on.

Why were your beans cold this morning? EU's DMA.

Why did you get delayed to your event? EU's DMA.

Why did it rain on the one day you were planning to take a trip? EU's DMA, of course.

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

Oh yes, won’t miss that.

[–] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago

Insert bored Jeremy Clarkson meme

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

By the way, how is apple intelligence different from potato intelligence?

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago
[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago

And nothing of value was lost...

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Who cares.

If Apple don't want to compete fair in the market, then others will.

And no iPhone user will miss an AI feature. Most of them don't even understand how to use 80% of the phones features anyway.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I cant wait for all the small smartphone manufacturers and os developers to come up with their solutions.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Dumb phones on the rise.

[–] UncommonBagOfLoot@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

then others will

Unfortunately, I don't think the others want to compete fair either. It's a big race to shove garbage to consumers.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I mean, can we get this in the US also?? Nobody wants this shit.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Im in the eu and Im fucking devastated.

[–] jose1324@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think they are being sarcastic without putting /s

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This. I never realize how autistic people on the internet are

[–] Scribbd@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
[–] localhost443@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 5 months ago

I think specifically with sarcasm it's an American issue. It's natural to us EU people, we can usually just detect it by instinct.

I've dealt with US people who just fail to detect it both on the phone and face to face. So no chance with text...

[–] stebator@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Apple is stepping on its own tail. The correct way to implement such features is to provide API to integrate any AI with their device, not only ChatGPT. And as an example, they should provide their own completely optional app for this, which could be downloaded from the App Store. This app should not be part of iOS at all. So EU regulators cannot do anything with it or it will be harder for them to figure out ways to restrict it. And users will worry less about privacy.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

It probably doesn't need to be an optional app if they're giving you the ability to use any model you want at the OS level integration.

When you're using the device for the first time show a screen and let them choose AI / provide their own local model.

I wonder how listing things alphabetical would go given apple would keep them near the top.

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 0 points 5 months ago

Regulation works.

[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 months ago

Lol, lmao even

[–] iaMLoWiQ@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

Google AI is already dominant there.