this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
480 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The saga continues...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 20 points 11 months ago (3 children)

im kinda surprised they havent just bought the problem. must be up against some of them giant patent hoarder groups

[–] millie@beehaw.org 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That or someone owns a legitimate patent that they don't feel like handing to Apple. Money doesn't automatically buy you the rights to the intellectual property of others.

[–] frog@beehaw.org 10 points 11 months ago

The article says Apple violated the patents of Masimo Corp and Cercacor Laboratories. Just 30 seconds of Googling reveals both are companies that make non-invasive health monitoring devices, so it does seem legit that they own legitimate patents that they don't want to sell to Apple.

[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Agreed. If it's a big patent troll against a startup, I get the criticism. Apple's a big corporation with a lot of clout that can easily be abused. I think it's best that the courts are handling this.

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Not everyone is for sale