Homelab

371 readers

9 users here now

Rules

Be Civil.
Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
No memes or potato images.
We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
Please no shitposting or blogspam.
No Referral Linking.
Keep piracy discussion off of this community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

rglullis@communick.news

I need someone to do a sanity check for me (i2p to bridge networks) (lemmy.zip)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/homelab@selfhosted.forum

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I'm trying to bridge to physical locations together. At one location I control the firewall and at the other I don't. I would normally use Wireguard but its all dynamic IPs so it would break every so often.

My though was to use I2P to create a bridge between the 2 places. I will use 0 hops on each with encrypted lease sets. Am I crazy or is this a good solution.

Update: don't

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] dasr@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Why not setup a Dynamic DNS at the site that has a dynamic IP do that you can always be sue that you have the most up to date, correct IP? WireGuard does support dynamic IPs, I use it my self when setting the ‘endpoint’ option client-side.