Technology

37747 readers

194 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

coldredlight@beehaw.org

Los@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

remington@beehaw.org

232

Google Chrome will limit ad blockers starting June 2024 (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 year ago by DolphinMath@slrpnk.net to c/technology@beehaw.org

81 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The "Manifest V3" rollout is back after letting tensions cool for a year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 89 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Remember, Firefox is great and has no dependency on upstream Google code.

Use Firefox.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Preaching to the wrong crowd there buddy, you want to be convincing the exact type of person who isn't on Lemmy

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure ad experience will move some masses, I liked Chrome because Ublock works fine there, it has great extensions support and the best compatibility with the websites, but if you remove the adblocker support I would have moved (if I hadn't already) in a heartbeat

[–] PeWu@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

The one and only, my beloved 🔥🦊

[–] marco@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

For a while I was a bit confused, because Mozilla said they would also implement V3 Manifest ...

by implementing Manifest V3 on its own terms, Mozilla saves developers who are switching to the new platform from having to support two different versions of their extensions (for Google Chrome and Firefox) at the same time. On the other hand, it allows content-blocking extensions that were originally built using the less restrictive Manifest V2 to continue working at full tilt.

https://adguard.com/en/blog/firefox-manifestv3-chrome-adblocking.html

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firefox is my daily, but the fact I have to fire up a chromium browser to use web serial or midi is an endless annoyance. Mozilla won’t add that functionality as they see it as a security risk.

[–] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

? I'm quite positive I've used MIDI in Firefox on hooktheory.

[–] Scrath@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, in my opinion it kind of is (though I'm not an expert on it). Except for convenience I don't think a browser should be allowed to access my USB devices. Though I would welcome it if it was enabled with the same kind of request that pops up when a browser wants to access the microphone or camera.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is, quite literally, how it works in Chromium. Mozilla still sees it as a security risk, even with user permissions. Honestly, having to boot Chromium is a bigger security risk.