this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
218 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37640 readers
161 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's a hard one. You train a general AI and ask for a story idea, that's not a huge deal IMO. You ask it to write in the style of George RR Martin or something that's something different. Yes you can do it by hand too, but these tools make it easier than ever.

Then sub questions... Is it okay to do it for free? What if you distribute it? What if you charge for it? All questions that these ai companies are just ignoring when they potentially have massive ramifications.

Making a random avatar is fine. Using ScarJo is iffy if you're using it for free. What if you're streaming on twitch with her? What if you're charging to use her likeness on twitch where the users will make money? Idk the answers to any of those.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But why would anyone commit anything fraudulent by that? Where exactly does it become "too much" AI?

I did it very iffy to argue that writing in the style of someone else is illegal. That's a perfectly normal thing to happen. Maybe AI makes it easier, but if an action is not illegal, why would doing the same thing tool assisted be illegal? Doesn't make sense.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think that writing in someone else’s style to an extent that it becomes very obvious is indeed something that raises copyright concerns.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, how would it? You can't copyright a style.

[–] lol3droflxp@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, there have been several music lawsuits about certain songs and their amount of identity to others. If you were to write something as closely to another author that you are imitating something like trademark mannerisms there may be a case for that.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Identity and style are two completely different things, though.

In literature, there are no trademark mannerisms.