Selfhosted

40329 readers

426 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Is anyone here selfhosting the psono password manager? (psono.com)

submitted 1 year ago by cron@feddit.de to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does anyone use the self hosted version of psono password manager? The demo looks very nice, however it seems to be very niche and it is rarely recommended. It appears in the "awesome selfhosted" repo, though.

I'm looking for a password manager for a small business, and bitwarden looks quite complex (and expensive) and I'm not very comfortable with vaultwarden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Clou42@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vaultwarden is the way to go. What is your issue with it?

[–] cron@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not entirely sure if bitwarden will introduce some changes that break the compatibility with vaultwarden.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They probably won't break compatibility with Vaultwarden on purpose since that'd also break their own server implementation. Bitwarden would have to ensure that all selfhosted servers are up to date before pushing a breaking auto update. This likely means enough time for vaultwarden to catch up.

Few things hurt a company providing critical software more than breaking users access without notice.

The passwords would still be accessible through the webui anyway.

Edit: If your not comfortable it's better to not use it. Password manager are critical and have to be trusted.

[–] cron@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're right, changes that break compatibility are unlikely. But they can happen and happened in the past (e.g. #3082)

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the example! I had hoped Bitwarden wouldn't break older servers so quickly. Luckily it seems like vaultwarden released a new working version 7 days before, the clients broke older servers. I'll definitly check my new release notifications for vaultwarden right now.

[–] Kaavi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't the frontend stuff open source? So even if they change something, others might make a fork?

[–] cron@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Most of the code is GPL3, but not everything. Source: license.txt