this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
93 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: The NFT market has drastically declined since its peak in 2021, with most NFT collections having no value. There's an oversupply of NFTs, leading to a buyer's market, and environmental concerns due to energy consumption. Top NFTs also struggle to maintain value, and the future of NFTs depends on utility and genuine value rather than speculation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

WTF is up with your media over there?!?

Once again, so many things currently wrong with the USA can be traced back to the Regan administration.

The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints.[1]

In 1987, the FCC abolished the fairness doctrine

The demise of this FCC rule has been cited as a contributing factor in the rising level of party polarization in the United States

After that news programs had no responsibility to be truthful in any real sense.

[–] gaael@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for this educational post, TIL I learned something interesting (and sad/infuriating).

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cheers.

I wasn't joking when I wrote this:

so many things currently wrong with the USA can be traced back to the Regan administration.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What, like your education system is so bad you can't even spell the names of your presidents? 😂

[–] tburkhol@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. https://www.educationnext.org/remembering-nation-risk-reflections-politics-policy/

Abolish the Department of Education. School choice vouchers. Standardized testing. All these memes started with Reagan. Not Regan, his Secretary of Treasury, but a lot of people confused Ronald Reagan and Donald Regan, even at the time.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, that was just a spelling mistake from a non-american, I have never heard of Donald Regan (and don't know if that is a joke or not)

[–] tburkhol@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No sweat, friend. I was just using the opportunity to extend the "It's all Reagan's fault" train. And Donald Regan was a real guy appointed by Ronald Reagan. They didn't have the diversity of names we do now, so a lot of them repeated, rhymed, or required a middle initial to differentiate. Like all the George Bushes - GWB, GPB, GHWB...

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Cheers for the info.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I am not american...

It is possible to know the history of another country but get something wrong occasionally.

Correcting spelling mistakes is the lowest rung of internet comments...

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

It's a joke on the mess that Reagan made of the education system, chill out

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the wise words of Killer Mike: “I’m glad Reagan dead”

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same.

It's a shame his Alzheimers didn't hit in 1981.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From some reports I have read about his time in the white house it had definitely started before he left office.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's probably likely, but I mean like... full-on, undeniable, this guy can't run the country Alzheimer's.

Not that it would have mattered a ton. Bush was just as corrupt, but who knows? All we know in retrospect is that Reagan was an absolute atrocity for the working class in this country.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not convinced the yanks had anything in place to deal with that. Look at recent demented presidents.

[–] Thisfox@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced the yanks had anything in place to deal with that. Look at recent demented presidents.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe there's an act covering presidential disability, dating from long before Reagan, due to a president's wife having effectively run the country for a couple of years while her husband was too ill to get out of bed. That would probably cover obvious and serious dementia as well. (Not my country, though, so I may have it wrong.) Problem with the recent Republican presidents is that their insanity is plausibly deniable, if your worldview is damaged enough already.