this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37739 readers
500 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
49
Does anyone know of a trustworthy and curated list of qanon sites that I can use for my pihole(s)? (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

So, until recently, I have been using https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/blob/master/hosts.txt

However, as some issues that I have opened have shown, there are a bunch of left wing and progressive sites on this list ( https://github.com/rimu/no-qanon/issues ). I no longer think that it is trustworthy. Especially after reading some of the repo owners replies. Intentionally added was t.me which is a generic url for any telegram group. Discordapp.com was on it at one point.

Oy Vey. It's clear to me that the owner of this repo is not actually spending much time actually curating this list and instead it's just a shotgun approach. Does anyone know of a good alternative?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Those were just the ones I found. There are likely many, many more. The sites I found are not even small publications either. Commondreams, rawstory, dailykos? Those are some very recognizable sites. if big ones like that slipped through, then that tells me that there is zero effort going into vetting the list.

[–] kglitch@kglitch.social 14 points 1 year ago

By all means, put some effort in. Please.

[–] MasterBuilder@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perhaps the curator is running a red herring with the intention or blocking liberal media?

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I highly doubt it tbh, but the thought did cross my mind.