this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
194 points (96.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40329 readers
426 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm trying to better understand hosting a Lemmy Instance. Lurking discussions it seems like some people are hosting from the Cloud or VPS. My understanding is that it's better to futureproof by running your own home server so that you have the data and the top most control of hardware, software etc. My understanding is that by hosting an instance via Cloud or VPS you are offloading the data / information to a 3rd party.

Are people actually running their own actual self-hosted servers from home? Do you have any recommended guides on running a Lemmy Instance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't know what hosting on the VPS should be called but it is definitely not self hosting. Since you are hosting your services on someone else's servers. Didn't it used to be called colo or something like that.

[–] Buckshot@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

I thought colo was your hardware in someone else's data center.

For me though a VPS is still self hosting because you own your applications data and have control over it.

You're less beholden to the whims of a company to change the software or cut you off. With appropriate backups you should be able to move to a new cloud provider fairly easily.

[–] PlexSheep@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

I disagree. Selfhosting is not specific to hardware location for me. My own git server is definitely selfhosted, VPN, and so on.

I agree that having your own hardware at home is a more pure way of doing it, but I'd just call that a Homelab. I personally just combine both.

[–] lemcat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Of course it's self hosting. The term "self hosting" just means being in control of the service or host yourself, as opposed to that being controlled by a third party.

It doesn't mean the hardware has to be in your house. It just so happens that that is the majority preference, because people value privacy, and are often hosting private data.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

Yup, it's more like self administration or something like that

[–] deur@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

I'd like to pose the fact that VPSes and Hosted solutions are different as a rebuttle to what you're saying. It's pretty unreasonable to gate keep self hosting behind having the hardware running on a device you control.