this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10176 readers
200 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jerome@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good lord, that dress can barely keep her breasts contained.

Edit: I should clarify that I meant this as an amusing observation (irony and all, with all their hollow talk of "modesty") and not because I give a shit what people wear.

Also, was funny watching her constantly pulling the top up to keep from having a wardrobe malfunction.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Who cares? It is not the reason she was kicked out. Focus on her shitty behavior and leave puritanical shaming out of it.

[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Whoa.

There was no shaming involved (at least not intentionally). People can wear whatever they want. I'm the last person to complain about people's choice of clothing.

It was an (amusing to me) observation, mostly because I found it ironic that she's on the side that praises "modesty" and then doesn't, as usual, practice what nonsense she preaches.

Also, I thought it was really funny how many times she had to keep pulling the top up to keep everything in there.

That's all my comment was. A throwaway observation about something I thought was funny.

Puritanical shaming? Man, sorry if it came across that way.

Edit: Oh, was it the "good lord" bit? I just use that term for comic effect a lot of the time. I forget it's something people say unironically with regard to their beliefs. I see now how that could have been misinterpreted.

I'm used to the term just being random exclamation a lot like how "Jesus Christ" or "OMG" or whatever are used these days. Apologies.

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it very much seemed like you were complaining about how revealing the outfit is without the context of the right being the "modesty" side. That makes much more sense. Most of the time you see someone complain about that kind of thing it is very much from the shaming side.

[–] comicallycluttered@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can definitely see how my comment could be interpreted that way.

Lol, I probably should have initially added that context.

Anyway, apologies for the misunderstanding!

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No worries. Thanks for the clarification

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 1 year ago

What kind of alternate dimension did I just wake up in?

This isn't how things are discussed on the internet, it's supposed to devolve into a gibberish of random accusations and ad-hominim attacks!

[–] klyde@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Nah I'm looking at those titties.