this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)
World News
32172 readers
664 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This type of logic only makes sense in the case of public utilities, not privately owned companies.
What do they think we're paying for? I don't see how the non-amortized costs (ie, non-infrastructure-buildout costs) could ever approach the amount they pull in revenue. This also ignores the fact that the telcos have gotten somewhere in the double-digit billions of dollars (iirc, around $40B) in taxpayer money to build out fiber infrastructure, that they never delivered on. What are they using this money for? What are they using their subscription revenue for?
You are mistaken: It's not over 40 billion, it's over 400 billion.
Thanks for the correction, I almost wish I didn't know how bad it was!