this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
309 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43970 readers
863 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This was the case before countries existed. The territories used to be limited to how far the human cattle could walk, be productive and walk back home in day.

Freedom is only possible where the possibility of encountering other humans is negligible.

Whenever humans aglomerate, non productive humans require handouts to live. If they do not receive then they die. If they don't want to die, they will steal. If the other humans resist, there will be a struggle and whoever wins becomes the state.

I think keeping population below 1 per square kilometer and spread out is the best solution to the state predation problem.

[–] nik282000@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Whenever humans aglomerate, non productive humans require handouts to live. If they do not receive then they die. If they don’t want to die, they will steal.

Yeah, we know, politicians.

You got it, the mediators between us and them. See Europe and their history with romas people, for what it looks like when this peace breaks down.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

1 per square kilometer is physically impossible unless you plan on finding a way to kill 7.9 billion people.

Earth has 146 million square kilometers of land.

It's a neat idea but I think "the largest genocide in the history of humanity" kinda outweighs your solution.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

About 64 million square km is habitable. Everyone stop having babies until we reach this number. That's how we can have a stateless borderless utopia.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You won't see it in your lifetime. About 150,000 people die a day assuming no natural disasters or disease. 7.9 billion / 150,000 = 52,666 days. About 144 years for your dream.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm fine to plant the idea of a borderless countryless stateless world without war even if I never sit in its shade

[–] monk@lemmy.unboiled.info 2 points 1 year ago

Can't tell whether sarcasm or high.