this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
756 points (99.7% liked)

World News

41221 readers
3155 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff, in a CNN interview with Jake Tapper, failed to specify any Russian concessions in a potential Ukraine peace deal despite detailing demands on Ukraine.

After claiming a "friendship" with Putin, Witkoff spoke vaguely about "territorial" and "economic" concessions from both sides. He also claimed a U.S.-Ukraine deal on raw earth minerals would be signed soon.

When confronted with Russian state TV footage suggesting Trump’s stance aligns with Putin’s, Witkoff insisted diplomacy requires communication.

His remarks fueled concerns over Trump’s approach to Russia and Ukraine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Burghler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The peace deal proposed by Trump is "Ukraine just take the fattest L known to any country in the last 100 years and be ok with it, and thanks for the rare earth minerals". While the US didn't deliver much support compared to EU.

Wtf is the point of your military if it's not for peace keeping?

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world -4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The US donated the most money by a wide margin lol we should fuel the war indefinitely and not opt for peace between both parties?

Granted, Trump could have said it in a more neutral manner, I don't agree with what he said about Zelenskyy, he still has the right idea to try to offer peace rather than let it stew into a nuclear war.

You can root for Ukraine to decimate Russia all you want, but war produces dead bodies of all ages and I'm sure you've never seen that carnage before.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 2 hours ago

The path toward peace is not "let the blatant aggressor get everything they want without concessions." Usually, if you want peace, you tell the instigator to knock it off or MAKE them knock it off. Otherwise, all that's learned is they can do it again, consequence-free.

[–] lysol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This is false, the EU donated more than the US. Trump says otherwise, yes, but he is lying.

Nuclear war is exactly what Trump is risking right now. Russia will go to war again if Trump gives them "peace". Only next time, they will attack a NATO country.

[–] Hellsfire29@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I wasn't going off Trump , I checked sites like statists and others before posting. However , his claim of 350 billion was quite an exaggeration.

We'll just have to wait and see what happens. Trump did say one thing that made sense. There is an ocean between us and Ukraine, the EU should be more involved than the USA.

The EU is starting to ramp up their donations recently. Perhaps that was Trump's intent. Dare we give him credit? Lol