this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
261 points (97.1% liked)

News

24316 readers
6254 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

US egg prices are rising due to a severe avian flu outbreak that has killed 14.7 million egg-laying hens since January, surpassing all of 2023’s losses.

Wholesale egg prices have surged, with shortages driving costs as high as $8.35 per dozen in California.

Restaurants and bakeries are struggling with higher costs, while grocery stores try to absorb some of the increase.

The issue has become politically charged as Trump and Republicans blame Biden.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Trump may have actually lowered the price of eggs -- albeit not of products in general.

So, he just imposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico. Canada and Mexico stated that they would impose agricultural tariffs in response -- not a surprise, as the US is a major agricultural exporter. The list of countertariffed items is not up, but:

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/news/2025/02/canada-announces-155b-tariff-package-in-response-to-unjustified-us-tariffs.html

A full list of these goods will be made available for a 21-day public comment period prior to implementation, and will include products such as passenger vehicles and trucks, including electric vehicles, steel and aluminum products, certain fruits and vegetables, aerospace products, beef, pork, dairy, trucks and buses, recreational vehicles, and recreational boats.

They don't explicitly list eggs, but they do list things adjacent to that, and I can believe that eggs might be on the tariff list.

The US runs a trade surplus in eggs.

https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-product/eggs/reporter/usa

2022 exports: $549 million, top partner Canada at $77.4 million

2022 imports, $118 million, top partner Canada at $8.19 million.

Trump's 25% tariffs will tend to reduce the amount of eggs being exported from Canada to the US, which will drive up egg prices in the US.

However, if the Canadian countertariffs -- also 25% -- have eggs on the list, which we don't yet know, they will tend to reduce the amount of eggs being exported from the US to Canada, which is about ten times the amount coming the opposite direction. That will tend to drive down egg prices in the US...and one would expect that effect to dominate the effect from reduced egg exports from Canada to the US.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Eggs in Canada are currently much cheaper than the US. They haven't been hit with bird flu as badly (in past because they don't cram millions of hens into the same facility) so there would be little reason to buy American eggs.

[–] JWBananas@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

But why is that? Is this one of those tar sands vs sweet crude situations

Over a dozen states have so-called "cage free" laws now, with some states like Colorado only recently having them go into effect as of January 2025.

https://www.ciwf.com/media-and-news/news/2025/01/us-companies-lead-in-cage-free-egg-transition-as-canada-falls-behind

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So then the smart move for Canada would be to not put tariffs on eggs, to keep them flowing into Canada and prices in America high?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Canda's interest is, I expect, to do whatever provides the most political leverage on Trump relative to the cost to Canada. If high egg prices are a cost-effective way to do that, then sure. My guess is that there are a lot of factors that go into that, though.

I would guess that if Canada is doing targeted tariffs -- which they stated that they were -- that the best things to hit are in swing states (which Presidents have to worry about the most), in politically-influential industries, on products that are very visible to consumers, and in areas where Canada can deal with higher domestic prices relatively-well. Given that a major Trump concern in his first term was the auto industry, was what got the most significant change in the USMCA changes, maybe that. They did list vehicles as one of their targets.

This is assuming, though, that Trump isn't just aiming to get in the news for having tariffs for a short period of time, declare that his policy was a success and that fentanyl has been dealt with, and then pull the tariffs. If that's the case, then I wouldn't expect this to go on for long.