this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

46115 readers
221 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm sorry, is it discouraged to be self aware? It is very common to have preconceived ideas about things based on media/whatever, however I am trying to be self aware enough to realise that this view isn't based on very much research, which is why I'm trying to re-evaluate it.

Surely it is far more arrogant to assume I have no ill-informed views, and that I have never been affected by misinformation.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You're arguing with tankies. You are attacking China in their eyes. You are fighting a losing battle because you cannot convince them China has major faults and blemishes and systemic issues like the US.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago

I don't think that's a useful framing. The central thesis of most "tankies" is that the version of the PRC that exists in the minds of Westerners and the version that exists in reality are fundamentally different, and that this is largely due to a concerted effort by western countries to depict China in a negative light exclusively. That does not mean that there aren't serious problems with the PRC, or that it doesn't have a long way to go, but admitting to having a negative stance without doing much investigation means that they should investigate, rather than contribute to a miasma of other ill-informed takes.