this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
152 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10176 readers
200 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prosecutors from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office are seeking a protective order after Donald Trump posted an apparent threat on Truth Social on Friday. Citing the former president’s all-caps declaration, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” prosecutors said his posts could have a “harmful chilling effect” on witnesses in the case against him if he were to start publicly posting information obtained in discovery. The DOJ is therefore asking a judge for a protective order blocking the “improper dissemination or use of discovery materials.” Prosecutors noted in their filing that the order is especially important since “the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And if it were literally anyone else, they would have been put in prison while awaiting trial due to their clear and present danger of inciting violence and retaliation.

I do not understand why everyone walks on eggshells around this asshole.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

They don't want to make him a martyr.

[–] Intelligence_Gap@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At the very least with this approach when he’s found guilty there will be no argument for impropriety or unfair treatment that could be used to get him out.

[–] ArtZuron@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

As if having no argument has stopped Magats before. They thrive on ignorance and malice.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

No good faith argument. But many are not willing to confine themselves to good faith.

[–] Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We have to be especially careful with people with significant resources. Any small mistakes caused by moving quickly can be leveraged for less consequences do to technicalities. In these cases, being reactionary is a detriment.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

How is it a mistake in this case to remand the defendant?