this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
497 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2574 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't think I need to summarize this one. This is bad news for everyone.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 119 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Basically it's too late to stop the process. Even if we switched to renewables entirely, there will be a lag. That lag is now in a positive feedback loop.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 131 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah like the science community was saying 10-15 years ago.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 74 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I remember some of the early research showing this when I was in college in the late 90s/early 00s. It's mostly following the worst-case scenario models from the time, except 50 - 80 years ahead of schedule.

[–] omgarm@feddit.nl 10 points 1 day ago

I started watching The Nanny a few days ago (have seen a lot on tv, but never everything) and in one of the first episodes they make a joke about being worried about Global Warming. It was lighthearted, not very serious. That was 1993.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whether you can risk it or can't. Its time to disobey our leaders. They dont care. They've built protections for themselves. They plan on feeding us to the storms.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There will be no protection or escape from the environmental changes we'll be facing, this is not something you can just wait out in a bunker.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yep, they'll let the climate kill all of us. Because they won't truly be living either down there. I'm sure all the training courses for guard loyalty in the world won't actually do shit when you're physically down in a bunker without hopes of coming out.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

They actually need us to do the shit jobs though. It's the ancient tale of the hubris of monarchs we somehow keep electing

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only we knew about this 50 years ago, surely we would have done something!

Big Oil: side eye Muppet meme

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fun fact: They knew since the 1950s and have been lying about it for over 70 YEARS!

[–] JohnOliver@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

Not to mention the tipping point where it is no longer reversible. And even worse, the huge effect that the current has on basically the whole of the globe!