this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
224 points (97.1% liked)

News

23367 readers
2928 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Always have and always will.

It's common sense that voters want someone who they think can and will help them.

Republicans lie about it and win elections. Dem politicians try to convince us populism is bad because it's not what their donors want.

A little bit of me dies everytime a "moderate" conflates populism with evil.

Populism is a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of the common people and often position this group in opposition to a perceived elite group.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

They hate populism because they're the political elite. They're the ones already not helping the common American and instead helping the other wealthy people.

If the Dem party pivots to populism, it means replacing both the elected and non elected leaders of the Dem party. And they're not going to do what's best for the country but worst for them personally voluntarily, or they'd be populists already.

We need to either force them out or start a new party, and four years isn't as much time as it seems.

[–] card797@champserver.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bernie party for the future. Whatever name it needs.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Semantics...

But no.

We can't tie it to a person, and Bernie is far to old to be the candidate.

Tying it to a person is what happened with Obama in 08, so when he left in 2016 there was a vacuum in the party. Hillary and the neoliberal rank and file filled that vacuum, and they were rooting for trump because they needed the worst possible opponent for Hilary to have a chance.

Bernie has been saying for decades he's not the answer, the answer is a movement. Not loyalty to a single person who can never last a decade in office.

As much as I love Bernie, he shouldn't even run for his own Senate seat again. He doesn't have to retire, there's a lot of good work he could do growing the movement. But he's too old for office and has been for a while.

[–] card797@champserver.net 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not talking about the man. I want his attitude and policies as the platform.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A little bit of me dies everytime a “moderate” conflates populism with evil.

conflate sure, but they're not mutually exclusive.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Obviously not.

But populists fucking win elections.

No one is saying the Dems need to run an evil populist. Or someone that lies about being a populist, like trump.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm more concerned that a populist Dem is a unicorn. The closest I've ever seen is Sanders or AOC and they're hardly mass appeal popular.

Anyone with a solid conscience and mass appeal that we actually know wouldn't want the job.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

. The closest I’ve ever seen is Sanders or AOC and they’re hardly mass appeal popular.

What?

Bernie could actually get republican voters and people who think the current Dem party is too far right.

Withe division along party lines being so deep, progressives are probably the most popular politicians in America right now, everyone else just most of their own party likes them. They're capped at 1/3 approval because of that

People continuingly act like 1/3 of the country just doesn't vote.

We saw in 08 with Obama they'll show up for a Dem running a populist campaign, and for whatever reason that's the last time we've tried it in 16 years.

Neoliberalism isn't popular enough to win elections. And all it's ever accomplished was driving Republicans to ever increasing extremes.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Bernie could actually get republican voters

nah, not buying that one. Never seen ANY inclination for them to call him anything but a dirty socialist.

People continuingly act like 1/3 of the country just doesn’t vote.

do you have any data that suggests overwise?

We saw in 08 with Obama they’ll show up for a Dem running a populist campaign,

63.6% turnout. Less white votes, more minority votes than 2000 or even 2004

Neoliberalism isn’t popular enough to win elections

This we can ardently agree on.

edit: spaces for formatting

[–] WorkIsSlow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

They call all Democrats dirty socialists already. If you start running somebody with popular policies it'll be harder to boogie man them away.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

they're hardly mass appeal popular.

100% propaganda pushed by the capitalist (and therefore anti-populist) mass media.