this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10175 readers
88 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We already have age limits at the lower end. Why are people so against age limits at the upper end?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TommySalami@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

To answer your question, most people aren't against age limits. But the elderly are the single strongest voting population and the people already in power won't do anything against their own interest without significant voter follow through.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone is for age limits until they would be affected.

[–] TommySalami@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope I have the wherewithal to maintain my convictions at that age. Perhaps that's naivete, but I never became conservative, either.

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still ardently pro-youth and against exclusion even at almost 40; I would like to believe I'll still be for age caps when I'm old. Like actual old. I know I'm already fuckin' old. You know what I mean.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've got over a decade on you, and if anything I'm further left and more pro age-limits than I've ever been in my life.

[–] howler@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Ditto. I recognize my cognitive slide from even 10 years ago... And Mitch has decades on me... I also realize that the older my kids have gotten, the more out of touch I've become.... These fossils dinner gaf though... Having strokes on live tv won't even stop them.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

Because the elderly don't work, so they can vote while everyone else is busy propping up the economy they built.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We should move to a system where votes are weighted based on age. Up to, say, 40 years of age your vote has a weight of 1.0. Above 40 the weight should reduce linearly each year until it reaches 0.1 at the age that equals the current life expectancy. Basically: the closer you are to death the shorter you are affected by the consequences of your votes, so you should have less influence. Older people are probe to short term thinking as they won’t live to see the long term effects anyway.

[–] StringTheory@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, Dred Scott vs Sanford raises its ugly head again.

When you get old enough to be worth 0.6, shall we call it “3/5” just for old times’ sake? As a compromise?

[–] Lowbird@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

What the fuck. What the fuck.