this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
702 points (99.6% liked)

News

23397 readers
3547 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal rule banning fake online reviews is now in effect. 

The Federal Trade Commission issued the rulein August banning the sale or purchase of online reviews. The rule, which went into effect Monday, allows the agency to seek civil penalties against those who knowingly violate it.

“Fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors,” FTC Chair Lina Khan said about the rule in August. She added that the rule will “protect Americans from getting cheated, put businesses that unlawfully game the system on notice, and promote markets that are fair, honest, and competitive.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Better than nothing but it also seems like it might be kind of difficult to prove the company allowed it knowingly.

[–] FPSkra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It prevented reviews and testimonials that misrepresent that they are by someone who does not exist. Fairly easy to prove. If they catch an individual posting a review while posing as anyone but themselves, It's a done deal.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In this context “knowingly” means “intentionally”, not that they knew there was a law against it.

An entity is in violation if they knowingly commit the act, not that they knowingly broke the law.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, I understand (ignorance of a law is no defense at least in the US) that but it still may prove difficult to actually prove.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well if you take a company like Amazon they know everything about you already, including if you actually purchased the item you are reviewing. And that should be a simple first "hurdle" for a reviewer to be legit. They already have a way of sorting them out and labeling them in place. So I would assume this means if you don't have that label your review doesn't go live. They can then add more qualifiers to prove they know the reviewers are real, since this seems to put the onus of proof on the company not that FTC.

Edit - some words

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is possible I bought the item at my local warmart though and then review it on amazon. I don't know if anyone does that, but it is possible.

[–] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 1 points 1 month ago

I feel like although possible now, that this may need to change going forward since I'm not sure how Amazon can validate your review if not done through their platform.

This of course fragments reviews to specific retail storefronts, but if the platform can't validate at least the fact you purchased the item I don't see anyway they can even begin to know you're leaving a legit review.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

I find that Amazon allows me to do that for good reviews, but whenever I leave a bad review for something I bought somewhere else the review disappears.