Asklemmy

43536 readers

1596 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

102

Using a Firefox fork makes any difference? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by NONE_dc@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Well, Mozilla seems to be making some pretty questionable decisions, So I'm considering switching browsers for the third (Is it the third?) time. The thing is, I really like the way Firefox works, so I've been trying out the more famous Forks like Waterfox and Librewolf, although I'm going for Floorp. However, I'm wondering: is using a fork enough? I mean, they are Forks maintained by other people, but is there a chance that whatever Mozilla does to Firefox could affect those Forks? Should I jump to a totally different browser like Vivaldi?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ads should be tailored to the content of the website they are on. Not to me in any way whatsoever.

Then you might be interested in this new technology being tested by Mozilla that aims to replace tracking cookies.

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No, that's the thing. I don't need to be tracked, not even if it's privacy safe.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then we continue to use anti-tracking extensions and block all ads. This is not for you.

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't need ads either though. But showing ads isn't really immoral. However, tracking you wherever you go to manipulate you into buying stuff by using psychological profiles is a totally different evil.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 0 points 16 hours ago

Like it or not, ads are still the most popular way to pay for online content. I despise ads and I hope some kind of micro-payment solution catches on and offers an alternative, but until then there needs to be a way to reward people for their work, so ads and full-on subscriptions it is.