this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
66 points (94.6% liked)

World News

38714 readers
2345 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Palestinian security services say attack on Tulkarm refugee camp is deadliest on West Bank in 24 years

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Timbits@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Let us pray justice will come to the violent terrorists in Israel.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

No, let us hope peace comes to the region and the endless cycle of bloodshed ends. That may include justice for the people responsible, but our main aspiration should be peace and prosperity, not retribution.

[–] Timbits@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The main aspiration should be justice. Peace without justice is not peace, it's defeat.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 3 points 2 hours ago

Is it? I'm not saying it's likely, but for the sake of argument let's say Netanyahu is voted out and a new Israeli government takes power that says, "We are tired of endless violence. We will remove all settlements, checkpoints, etc, and respect a two state solution with Palestinian sovereignty over the agreed upon Palestinian land." Would that not be the goal, the ideal? Or would you throw that away by trying to get back at Netanyahu and all the horrible people who have committed these crimes. Maybe I'm naïve, but you can't say that at least the aspiration should be peace. Whether that's possible without something happening to the perpetrators of violence is another question, but the retribution shouldn't be the end goal and aspiration, peace should be.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Peter Tosh's song "Equal Rights" makes that point very eloquently.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There can be no sustainable peace without justice.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There can be no sustainable peace with constant retribution, I think that's the core thing going through this conflict this last century. For example, Israel wanted "justice" for the October 7th attacks. Did that lead to a better outcome for humanity and people living in the area? No, only more war and suffering. More war, bloodshed, and retribution is not the answer, we need to break the cycle of violence.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I agree. In order to break the cycle of retribution we need to achieve justice. Otherwise people will continue to seek it. The difficulty includes that this wont work without having everyone involved face the reality of their actions. We will need extensive education and a process that will probably exceed the Nuremberg trials by a large factor. The only alternative to achieve "peace" in the long run would be to completely genocide or ethnically cleanse one side from the region. That is how the US got away with what it did to the native Americans.

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago

I agree with this take completely. The parent comment just seemed to encourage senseless retribution without nuance, which is what I tried to voice my opposition to.