this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
56 points (85.9% liked)

Linux

48364 readers
1372 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am not the author.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] data1701d@startrek.website 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Honestly, it's 2024, and as a result, this post gives me a bit of a chuckle. For most purposes, systemd has won, and honestly, I hardly even notice. (Granted, I have only used Linux during the systemd era.) If systemd actually interferes with one's needs on a technological (not just a vague philosophical) level, little stops them from seeking out a way to use another init system.

Has it gotten more difficult to use other init systems these days? Yes. However, by the time a person has a problem where systemd can't do the job and have to use a different init system, they're probably more than competent enough to create custom services. I also feel like in terms of software support, only the most idiotic, worthless projects have no possible way to port hem to another init system.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I used Linux during the init.d days. What a nightmare that was.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

The only thing I liked was arch's pretty boot sequence … which I stared at for a while because SysV init was so slow.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Busybox init and openRC seem to be the alternatives. They are both useful in embedded contexts where you don't need much just a program to start a service

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

I may have misconveyed my meaning. I wasn't necessarily arguing that systemd has no viable alternatives. I meant to say that where systemd doesn't work (embedded systems being a good example), chances are the lack of support won't be a burden for a reasonably skilled user.