this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
62 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I just don’t see getting to a billion without someone being taken advantage of on the way though.

Just because you don't understand doesn't mean it's false.

[–] itsralC@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

You really pulled the extendo grip out, huh?

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By all means, show me some billionaires that never took advantage of anyone to get their billions and actually earned it. I'm down to change my view.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

show me some billionaires that never took advantage of anyone to get their billions

You can't prove a negative, screwball. It's literally impossible to prove "never took advantage of anyone" about anyone, billionaire or not.

Not that you're almost certainly using an overbroad definition of 'take advantage', on top of it.

I'm down to change my view.

No, you aren't. People who are don't play these kinds of semantic games.

[–] ericbomb@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

My man I don't think you belong the the MARXIST LENNIST instance if you're this aggro at someone saying something as generic as "Billionaires exploited people to get their billions"

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

If you were following burden of proof, you could stake your claim on particular billionaires who you say never exploited anyone, and it would then be on the other fellow to prove they did exploit people. Without example billionaires, however, your claim is nebulous and no one has any particular reason to believe in it.